Why You Should Value the S&P Using “As Reported” Earnings Data
When people quote analyst earnings expectations, they are usually referring to “operating” earnings which adjusts “as reported” (GAAP) earnings for non-recurring items. People use operating earnings because they show a cleaner picture of results that is more comparable to past or future periods. If the charges are one-time in nature, they don’t necessarily have to be counted in future projections.
This makes sense for an individual company; however, when you look at the S&P 500 as a whole, it’s not so valid. That’s because when you aggregate the S&P 500, “unusual” charges end up becoming “usual” charges that should be expected to repeat in the future. One-time charges will come different companies in different periods, but in aggregate a baseline amount of charges should be counted on to detract from earnings.
As shown in the chart above, “as reported” earnings has consistently been below “operating” earnings for the last 25 years. In recessions, unusual charges tend to run at greater levels than in flush times, but unusual charges outweigh unusual gains even in boom times. In other words, you can count on one time charges happening in every period.
In the median trailing twelve month period, as reported earnings trail operating earnings by 10%. That’s the “usual” amount of “unusual” charges. Because unusual charges do fluctuate, it might make sense to normalize operating earnings by adjusting them lower by 10%, but it doesn’t make sense to leave operating earnings alone completely because that assumes that these one time charges wont keep happening.
If you adjust by 10%, adjusted operating earnings would still be higher than as reported earnings during recessions (when one-time charges tend to run higher), but adjusted operating earnings would be lower than as reported earnings during booms when one time charges tend to be less prevalent. This methodology is more consistent with why analysts are excluding one-time charges to begin with. Currently, as reported earnings are only 7% below operating earnings ($103.68 vs. $111.67), which suggests that the “normalized” earnings number for the S&P 500 should be lower than as reported earnings.
This has important implications for market valuation metrics. Forward earnings multiples are based on operating earnings as well. “Non recurring” charges represent the difference between the S&P selling for 17.2x operating earnings and 18.5x as reported earnings. If normalized earnings are assumed to be 10% less than the value of operating earnings, then current normalized earnings are $100.50, which means the S&P 500 trades for 19.1x.
Recommended for You
If you want to get rich, start investing — and start as early as you possibly can...Business Insider
After years of declining business, Arby's and Burger King are coming out on top. Arby's...Business Insider
Energy giant Chevron will eliminate about 1,500 job positions in an effort to cut costs, Reuters reported Tuesday.CNBC
Lithium is at the frontline in the war to rival Tesla’s gigafactory and corner the energy storage market, and it will be the hottest commodity in energy this decadeOilprice.com
Jim Cramer provides his opinion on caller favorite stocks, including this popular oil play.CNBC
The second quarter performance will surely be the one that Vanguard would love to forget.Zacks
The continuing war of words between the Republicans in the House of Representatives and the leadership of the Internal Revenue Service escalated dramatically late Monday, when the Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform issued an ultimatum to President Obama: Fire IRS John…The Fiscal Times
One of the legendary investor's favorite measurements suggests that China's stock market may not be in a bubble.Fortune
With the resumed uncertainty in Europe surrounding Greece and the sudden bear market gripping China, the price of oil has once again slid under $50. While low oil prices may be welcomed by drivers at the ...Investopedia
July 28 -- According to Donald Trump's personal financial disclosure form, the Republican presidential hopeful has a net worth of $10 billion. Bloomberg crunched the numbers and determined Trumps fortune to be $2.9 billion. Bloomberg's Caleb Melby breaks down Trump's finances on "Bloomberg…Bloomberg Video
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve is moving toward raising interest rates from record lows — just not likely yet.Associated Press
NEW YORK — The competition between T-Mobile CEO John Legere and Sprint's chief Marcelo Claure is about to get heated — again.USA TODAY
Wayne Cooperman, Cobalt Capital Management, and Leon Cooperman, Omega Advisors Chairman & CEO, discuss their top holdings.CNBC Videos
Donald Trump had the Internet flipping out — again — on his visit to the Mexican border last week by covering his signature orange coif with an ill-fitting white cap emblazoned with his campaign slogan, “Make America Great Again” — a slogan made famous by Ronald Reagan but recently trademarked by…The Fiscal Times
Here's the secret to solving the 'pizza' brainteaser Goldman Sachs has asked candidates in job interviews
In a recent roundup of interview questions Goldman Sachs has been known to ask, we came...Business Insider
Accenture, a business management company made up of about 330,000 employees, announced this week that as of September, annual performance reviews would be disbanded. The firm is joining a small but influential number of companies that no longer rely on performance reviews. Cliff Stevenson, senior…The Fiscal Times
Vanguard is best known for low-cost mutual funds, but its exchange-traded funds may be a better bet. Vanguard's 52 ETFs track the same benchmarks as its passively managed index mutual funds, and in some ...Kiplinger