U.S. markets closed

These 4 Measures Indicate That Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) Is Using Debt Extensively

Simply Wall St

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (NYSE:DBD) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for Diebold Nixdorf

What Is Diebold Nixdorf's Debt?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2019, Diebold Nixdorf had US$2.22b of debt, up from US$1.89b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had US$271.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.95b.

NYSE:DBD Historical Debt, August 28th 2019

A Look At Diebold Nixdorf's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Diebold Nixdorf had liabilities of US$1.57b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$2.82b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$271.0m and US$712.5m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$3.40b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$825.8m company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, Diebold Nixdorf would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Diebold Nixdorf shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (5.6), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 0.70 times the interest expense. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. One redeeming factor for Diebold Nixdorf is that it turned last year's EBIT loss into a gain of US$134m, over the last twelve months. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Diebold Nixdorf can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. In the last year, Diebold Nixdorf's free cash flow amounted to 27% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

Our View

To be frank both Diebold Nixdorf's interest cover and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Diebold Nixdorf has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. Given our concerns about Diebold Nixdorf's debt levels, it seems only prudent to check if insiders have been ditching the stock.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.