U.S. markets close in 1 hour 18 minutes
  • S&P 500

    -30.04 (-0.78%)
  • Dow 30

    +50.36 (+0.16%)
  • Nasdaq

    -299.66 (-2.24%)
  • Russell 2000

    -13.41 (-0.60%)
  • Crude Oil

    +1.66 (+2.78%)
  • Gold

    -22.00 (-1.27%)
  • Silver

    -0.65 (-2.41%)

    -0.0013 (-0.11%)
  • 10-Yr Bond

    +0.0540 (+3.82%)

    +0.0006 (+0.05%)

    +0.2510 (+0.24%)

    +2,750.86 (+5.75%)
  • CMC Crypto 200

    +25.33 (+2.56%)
  • FTSE 100

    +61.72 (+0.93%)
  • Nikkei 225

    +150.93 (+0.51%)

Abercrombie Rejected A 17-Year-Old Girl For A Job, And Now The Supreme Court Will Hear Her Case

Erin Fuchs
·Deputy Managing Editor
Samantha Elauf
Samantha Elauf

Aslan Media/Flickr Samantha Elauf. The US Supreme Court will hear a dispute this term over Abercrombie & Fitch's decision not to hire a 17-year-old Muslim girl who wore a headscarf and would have violated the store's notorious "Look Policy."

The justices agreed to hear Samantha Elauf's case back in October, and in recent days "friend of the court" briefs supporting her have flooded in from the ACLU, several states, and the American Jewish Committee, as well as gay rights and religious liberty groups.

Elauf, who's now a fashion blogger in her 20s, applied for a job as an Abercrombie model in Tulsa, Oklahoma, back when she was 17, according to a legal document filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which brought the case on her behalf.

At Abercrombie, "models" are sales associates who are expected to model the store's style in compliance with its "Look Policy."

An Abercrombie assistant manager considered Elauf a "good candidate" but wasn't sure whether her headscarf violated Abercrombie's so-called look policy, according to the EEOC brief. That assistant manager consulted a manager, explaining that she thought Elauf wore the scarf for religious reasons. The manager said the headscarf wasn't permitted, even if Elauf wore it because she was a Muslim, according to the EEOC.

Elauf didn't get the job, and the EEOC brought its case against the preppy retail giant.

The main issue here is whether Abercrombie violated a federal law that says companies can't refuse to hire people simply because of how they practice their religion — unless employers can show they're simply not able to accommodate those practices.

Abercrombie says it didn't violate that law because it never got "direct, explicit notice" from Elauf that her religious practice conflicted with Abercrombie's look policy.

"[A]n applicant or employee cannot remain silent before the em ployer regarding the religious nature of his or her conflicting practice and need for an accommodation and still hope to prevail in a religion-accommodation case," Abercrombie noted in a brief it filed in the case.

Since this EEOC case was filed, Abercrombie has changed its look policy to allow headscarves. But it is still very invested in how its models look.

"Abercrombie expends a great deal of effort to ensure that its target customers receive a holistically brand-based, sensory experience," Abercrombie's brief stated. " To Abercrombie, a Model who violates the Look Policy by wearing inconsistent clothing 'inaccurately represents the brand, causes consumer confusion, fails to perform an essential function of the position, and ultimately damages the brand.”

While the Supreme Court has agreed to take on the case, it has not yet set a date for oral argument.

Earlier this month, longtime Abercrombie CEO Mike Jeffries stepped down after a rocky tenure that included allegations of discrimination and exclusion.

NOW WATCH: 8 Subliminal Messages In Corporate Logos You've Never Noticed Before

More From Business Insider