Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at Wells Capital Management, said Friday the government's April jobs data were not as strong as they appear.
"If you put in the revisions, it's a fairly back-to-back weak number again on average-below the 200,000 level with the negative revisions," Paulsen said on CNBC's " Squawk Box ," moments after the employment numbers showed nonfarm payroll growth basically matching expectations for last month.
The Labor Department said the U.S. economy created 223,000 new jobs in April, with the unemployment rate falling to a seven-year low of 5.4 percent. But the already weak March payrolls number was revised lower to 85,000 from 126,000.
"I think people were bracing for a powerful number that might move up the Fed's exit strategy, and this sort of cooled that off," Paulsen said. "I think that's why we're getting a rally" in the stock market.
Austan Goolsbee, former Obama administration chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, provided a different interpretation.
"Now you're going to hear a lot of discussion again about the Fed," the University of Chicago Booth School of Business professor said. "Maybe [the March number] was just an aberration, and so the Fed will act."
Ahead of the jobs report, many economists were thinking the Federal Reserve might increase interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade in September, with outliers holding on to June as a possibility.
Read More Trading on jobs report? Fahgettaboudit
But now, former Fed economist and ex-Romney economic policy adviser Kevin Hassett said forget June because the jobs report does not make him believe that the weak economic growth of the first quarter is going to pick up in the second quarter.
"We're not that far from still believing the second quarter is going to be very, very weak," said Hassett, who's with the American Enterprise Institute. "There's no way [Fed policymakers] are going to move in June" on rates.
More From CNBC