U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    3,825.33
    +39.95 (+1.06%)
     
  • Dow 30

    31,097.26
    +321.86 (+1.05%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    11,127.84
    +99.14 (+0.90%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,727.76
    +19.77 (+1.16%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    108.32
    -0.11 (-0.10%)
     
  • Gold

    1,808.90
    +7.40 (+0.41%)
     
  • Silver

    19.74
    +0.07 (+0.37%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0435
    +0.0009 (+0.08%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.8890
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2115
    +0.0012 (+0.10%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    135.4310
    +0.2560 (+0.19%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    19,116.11
    -2.47 (-0.01%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    412.65
    -7.49 (-1.78%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,248.22
    +79.57 (+1.11%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,153.81
    +218.19 (+0.84%)
     

Balanced vs. Puritan- Which Fidelity Fund Should I Own

Here are two questions we’ve answered for about as long as we’ve been publishing this newsletter (which is now almost 35 years  — “What are the differences between Fidelity Balanced (FBALX) and Fidelity Puritan (FPURX), and which of these asset allocation funds should I own?” notes John Bonnanzio, editor of Fidelity Insight & Monitor.

More from John Bonnanzio: Floating Rate: Fidelity's Sweet Spot in High Yield

Let’s start with the easiest stuff first: At 0.99 these growth and income funds are very highly correlated. (1.00 would be perfectly correlated.)

And, despite their both holding large dollops of bonds (nearly a third of assets), they are also highly correlated to the S&P 500. However, their bonds greatly reduce portfolio risk to roughly 30% below that stock index. Of course, there are important differences.

Starting with their equity portfolios (which morph over time), Balanced presently has a larger stock allocation relative to Puritan (72% versus 67%, respectively). That difference suggests that Balanced is the riskier of the two.

In addition, it has a bit more in bonds and a bit less in cash, which also adds to risk. But reducing its risk relative to Puritan is how Balanced allocates its stocks: there’s a significantly smaller tech weight (19% versus 25%) which, in turn, results in the fund’s lower price-earnings (P/E) ratio.

That, by-the-way, is emblematic of its large-cap blend focus, whereas Puritan’s is large-cap growth. And, on the bond side, Balanced holds only half as much in high yield (junk) bonds (8% vs. 16%). Given the above, we might reasonably assume that Balanced is the less risky of the two, right? Well, not so fast!

Despite all the extra risk-baggage seemingly carried by Puritan, it turns out that both funds’ 3-year relative volatilities are practically identical (0.73 and 0.72).

With a bit more digging it turns out that Puritan’s investment team favors much bigger stocks: its weighted median market cap is an enormous $109 billion versus Balanced fund’s $78 billion.

In addition, Puritan holds no volatile small-caps (versus nearly 3% for Puritan) and just 4% in mid-caps (versus 12% for Balanced).

See also: Centerpoint: 5-Star Buy in Energy Services

Of course, Puritan’s 5% stake in cash also helps to taper its risk. As to which of these funds we prefer, this is where we punt: both are rated Buy as Balanced and Puritan have long delivered attractive risk-adjusted returns.

More from John McCamant: What's Next for a FAANG Fund?

See also: Centerpoint: 5-Star Buy in Energy Services

More From MoneyShow.com: