Is Bega Cheese Limited’s (ASX:BGA) 8.2% Return On Capital Employed Good News?

In this article:

Today we are going to look at Bega Cheese Limited (ASX:BGA) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. To be precise, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that will inform our view of the quality of the business.

First of all, we’ll work out how to calculate ROCE. Second, we’ll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. And finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

ROCE is a measure of a company’s yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Generally speaking a higher ROCE is better. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that ‘one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar’.

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Bega Cheese:

0.082 = AU$77m ÷ (AU$1.2b – AU$278m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2018.)

Therefore, Bega Cheese has an ROCE of 8.2%.

Check out our latest analysis for Bega Cheese

Want to help shape the future of investing tools? Participate in a short research study and receive a subscription valued at $60.

Is Bega Cheese’s ROCE Good?

When making comparisons between similar businesses, investors may find ROCE useful. We can see Bega Cheese’s ROCE is around the 8.7% average reported by the Food industry. Aside from the industry comparison, Bega Cheese’s ROCE is mediocre in absolute terms, considering the risk of investing in stocks versus the safety of a bank account. Readers may find more attractive investment prospects elsewhere.

As we can see, Bega Cheese currently has an ROCE of 8.2% compared to its ROCE 3 years ago, which was 5.0%. This makes us think about whether the company has been reinvesting shrewdly.

ASX:BGA Last Perf January 30th 19
ASX:BGA Last Perf January 30th 19

When considering this metric, keep in mind that it is backwards looking, and not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. What happens in the future is pretty important for investors, so we have prepared a free report on analyst forecasts for Bega Cheese.

How Bega Cheese’s Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Current liabilities include invoices, such as supplier payments, short-term debt, or a tax bill, that need to be paid within 12 months. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

Bega Cheese has total assets of AU$1.2b and current liabilities of AU$278m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 23% of its total assets. This is a modest level of current liabilities, which would only have a small effect on ROCE.

The Bottom Line On Bega Cheese’s ROCE

If Bega Cheese continues to earn an uninspiring ROCE, there may be better places to invest. Of course you might be able to find a better stock than Bega Cheese. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have grown earnings strongly.

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

Advertisement