They have been on a freaking tear. This brings up an obvious question: With many of these names at or around all-time highs, should you bank profits?
I'm of two minds on this.
First, when you consider the massive gains over the last year -- nearly 66% in Madison Square Garden , 54% in Time Warner , 49% in News Corp and, on the relatively modest end, an almost 16% pop in BCE (formerly Bell Canada) -- it's tough to argue against taking profits. In fact, you probably should have been writing covered calls and and taking profits all along.
The great Jeff Macke did an excellent piece for Yahoo! Finance on Wednesday about not getting fleeced like so many Apple shareholders with big gains did over the last several months.
Use trailing stops. Take profits. Don't call tops or bottoms! (That might be the best one). And I would add start writing in-the-money covered calls on winners as profits surge. Classic, but solid advice too many investors fail to take. Emotion enters the equation; they get crushed. It seemingly takes a fraction of the time for profits to evaporate that it took for them to build.
So, no doubt, a battleground name such as AAPL or a relative outperformer like the names on the chart, requires, at the very least, a look at strategies designed to take some money -- and risk -- off the table.
However, at the same time, there might not be a healthier sector to invest in than big media. As Netflix continues to rise on little more than jive talk, the old guard media actually has leverage regarding content. This, not to mention the cash and relatively reliable revenue lines these companies have behind them, makes them sustainable long-term investments, even at these highs. They're not speculative, ride-the-wave trades like NFLX.
Every name on that chart owns and/or controls premium content, ranging from sports to movies to the best primetime television shows. Time Warner, News Corp, Disney and CBS , along with Comcast , control practically "everything." That's really not much of a stretch.
In Canada, BCE and Rogers Communications enjoy carte blanche from regulators that an American company could never dream of.
The name I left out -- MSG -- is a special case. Despite the lofty valuations, you have to think MSG, as well as AMC Networks , is ripe for takeover by a News Corp, Time Warner or Viacom . These types of companies represent missing puzzle pieces as the major media conglomerates look to develop key regions of the country and assemble sports and original programming empires.
It's the most overlooked bull story in the stock market: Massive gains in big, old guard media names. It's not a fluke. It's not merely the product of a bull market. It's real and, while it's always wise to exercise caution via profit taking, the long-term narrative across the sector remains firmly intact, warranting confident price-to-earnings ratios.
--Written by Rocco Pendola in Santa Monica, Calif.