U.S. Markets closed

Here’s What Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A.’s (BIT:BC) ROCE Can Tell Us

Simply Wall St

Today we’ll look at Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A. (BIT:BC) and reflect on its potential as an investment. Specifically, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

Firstly, we’ll go over how we calculate ROCE. Next, we’ll compare it to others in its industry. Then we’ll determine how its current liabilities are affecting its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE measures the ‘return’ (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Generally speaking a higher ROCE is better. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since ‘No two businesses are exactly alike.’

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Brunello Cucinelli:

0.22 = €68m ÷ (€477m – €163m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2018.)

So, Brunello Cucinelli has an ROCE of 22%.

See our latest analysis for Brunello Cucinelli

Does Brunello Cucinelli Have A Good ROCE?

ROCE can be useful when making comparisons, such as between similar companies. Using our data, we find that Brunello Cucinelli’s ROCE is meaningfully better than the 13% average in the Luxury industry. We would consider this a positive, as it suggests it is using capital more effectively than other similar companies. Regardless of the industry comparison, in absolute terms, Brunello Cucinelli’s ROCE currently appears to be excellent.

BIT:BC Past Revenue and Net Income, March 15th 2019

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. ROCE is, after all, simply a snap shot of a single year. What happens in the future is pretty important for investors, so we have prepared a free report on analyst forecasts for Brunello Cucinelli.

Brunello Cucinelli’s Current Liabilities And Their Impact On Its ROCE

Current liabilities are short term bills and invoices that need to be paid in 12 months or less. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

Brunello Cucinelli has total assets of €477m and current liabilities of €163m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 34% of its total assets. A medium level of current liabilities boosts Brunello Cucinelli’s ROCE somewhat.

The Bottom Line On Brunello Cucinelli’s ROCE

Even so, it has a great ROCE, and could be an attractive prospect for further research. But note: Brunello Cucinelli may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with strong recent earnings growth (and a P/E ratio below 20).

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.