Advertisement
U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,604.37
    +18.78 (+0.41%)
     
  • Dow 30

    36,247.87
    +130.49 (+0.36%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,403.97
    +63.98 (+0.45%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,880.82
    +12.57 (+0.67%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    71.26
    +1.92 (+2.77%)
     
  • Gold

    2,020.80
    -25.60 (-1.25%)
     
  • Silver

    23.29
    -0.77 (-3.20%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0764
    -0.0034 (-0.31%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2450
    +0.1160 (+2.81%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2551
    -0.0043 (-0.34%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    144.8930
    +0.7020 (+0.49%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    44,137.27
    +711.30 (+1.64%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    914.81
    +18.10 (+2.02%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,554.47
    +40.75 (+0.54%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    32,307.86
    -550.45 (-1.68%)
     

California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 84%

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies California Water Service Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

If you want to know who really controls California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of California Water Service Group.

See our latest analysis for California Water Service Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About California Water Service Group?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in California Water Service Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see California Water Service Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in California Water Service Group. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 18% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 8.8% of the stock.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of California Water Service Group

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of California Water Service Group in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$27m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over California Water Service Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand California Water Service Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with California Water Service Group (including 2 which are significant) .

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Advertisement