U.S. Markets closed

Is China Oriental Group Company Limited’s (HKG:581) 34.62% ROE Strong Compared To Its Industry?

Lacy Summers

China Oriental Group Company Limited (SEHK:581) delivered an ROE of 34.62% over the past 12 months, which is an impressive feat relative to its industry average of 9.35% during the same period. Superficially, this looks great since we know that 581 has generated big profits with little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us how much 581 has borrowed in debt. We’ll take a closer look today at factors like financial leverage to determine whether 581’s ROE is actually sustainable. See our latest analysis for China Oriental Group

Breaking down Return on Equity

Return on Equity (ROE) is a measure of China Oriental Group’s profit relative to its shareholders’ equity. It essentially shows how much the company can generate in earnings given the amount of equity it has raised. Generally speaking, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are other factors we must also consider before making any conclusions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is measured against cost of equity in order to determine the efficiency of China Oriental Group’s equity capital deployed. Its cost of equity is 8.46%. Given a positive discrepancy of 26.16% between return and cost, this indicates that China Oriental Group pays less for its capital than what it generates in return, which is a sign of capital efficiency. ROE can be split up into three useful ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

SEHK:581 Last Perf May 9th 18

Essentially, profit margin shows how much money the company makes after paying for all its expenses. Asset turnover reveals how much revenue can be generated from China Oriental Group’s asset base. The most interesting ratio, and reflective of sustainability of its ROE, is financial leverage. Since ROE can be artificially increased through excessive borrowing, we should check China Oriental Group’s historic debt-to-equity ratio. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a low 16.91%, which means its above-average ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

SEHK:581 Historical Debt May 9th 18

Next Steps:

ROE is one of many ratios which meaningfully dissects financial statements, which illustrates the quality of a company. China Oriental Group’s above-industry ROE is encouraging, and is also in excess of its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. Although ROE can be a useful metric, it is only a small part of diligent research.

For China Oriental Group, I’ve put together three relevant factors you should further research:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.
  2. Valuation: What is China Oriental Group worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether China Oriental Group is currently mispriced by the market.
  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of China Oriental Group? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.