NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 18, 2019 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court. Further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.
TEUM Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-form?prid=4954&wire=1
HEXO Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/hexo-corp-loss-form?prid=4954&wire=1
XYF Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/x-financial-loss-form?prid=4954&wire=1
* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BELOW *
Pareteum Corporation (TEUM)
TEUM Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased December 14, 2017 - October 21, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : December 23, 2019
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-form?prid=4954&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Pareteum Corporation made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) it was not true that the Company's purported success was the result of hyper-demand for Pareteum's unique products or exceptional service, or the Company's competent management; but, in fact, Defendants had propped up the Company's results by manipulating Pareteum's accounting for revenues, income, and the important Backlog metric; (b) Defendants had materially overstated the Company's profitability by failing to properly account for the Company's results of operations and by artificially inflating the Company's financial results; (c) it was not true that Pareteum contained even the most minimally adequate systems of internal operational or financial controls necessary to assure that Pareteum's reported financial statements were true, accurate, and/or reliable; (d) as a result, it also was not true that the Company's financial statements and reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC rules; and (e) as a result of the aforementioned adverse conditions, Defendants lacked any reasonable basis to claim that Pareteum was operating according to plan, or that Pareteum could achieve the guidance sponsored and/or endorsed by Defendants.
HEXO Corp. (HEXO)
HEXO Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased January 25, 2019 - November 15, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : January 27, 2020
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/hexo-corp-loss-form?prid=4954&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, HEXO Corp. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) HEXO's reported inventory was misstated as the Company was failing to write down or write off obsolete product that no longer had value; (2) HEXO was engaging in channel-stuffing in order to inflate its revenue figures and meet or exceed revenue guidance provided to investors; (3) HEXO was cultivating cannabis at its facility in Niagara, Ontario that was not appropriately licensed by Health Canada; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
X Financial (XYF)
XYF Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased X Financial American Depositary Shares pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's September 19, 2018 initial public offering.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : February 7, 2020
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/x-financial-loss-form?prid=4954&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, (i) the Company's total loan facilitation amount was not growing, but rather was contracting; (ii) the number of investors actively using X Financial's platform was shrinking; (iii) demand from small- and medium-sized enterprises for the Company's preferred loans was plummeting; (iv) the Company's preferred loans had performed so poorly that it had begun drastically scaling back its preferred loans in the first quarter of 2018, several months before the initial public offering ("IPO"), and was in the process of phasing out such loans completely; (v) demand for the Company's card loans was also plummeting; (vi) the revenue and loan facilitation growth provided in the registration statement leading up to the IPO was achieved by relaxed credit and due diligence standards, under which the Company had underwritten tens of millions of dollars' worth of poor quality loans that suffered from a disproportionately high risk of default as compared to the Company's earlier loan vintages; (vii) the Company was suffering from accelerated delinquency rates from poor quality loans that it had underwritten in the first, second, and third quarters of 2018, which had caused the Company's delinquency rate to sharply rise; (viii) the Company's product mix had significantly deteriorated; (ix) the Company's net revenue was on track to decline by 22% during the third quarter of 2018; and (x) as a result, the Registration Statement was materially false and/or misleading and failed to state information required to be stated therein.
You have until the lead plaintiff deadlines to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
View source version on accesswire.com: