Should You Be Concerned About China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corporation Ltd’s (SGX:G92) Historical Volatility?

In this article:

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and receive a $20 prize!

If you own shares in China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corporation Ltd (SGX:G92) then it’s worth thinking about how it contributes to the volatility of your portfolio, overall. In finance, Beta is a measure of volatility. Modern finance theory considers volatility to be a measure of risk, and there are two main types of price volatility. First, we have company specific volatility, which is the price gyrations of an individual stock. Holding at least 8 stocks can reduce this kind of risk across a portfolio. The second type is the broader market volatility, which you cannot diversify away, since it arises from macroeconomic factors which directly affects all the stocks on the market.

Some stocks mimic the volatility of the market quite closely, while others demonstrate muted, exagerrated or uncorrelated price movements. Beta can be a useful tool to understand how much a stock is influenced by market risk (volatility). However, Warren Buffett said ‘volatility is far from synonymous with risk’ in his 2014 letter to investors. So, while useful, beta is not the only metric to consider. To use beta as an investor, you must first understand that the overall market has a beta of one. Any stock with a beta of greater than one is considered more volatile than the market, while those with a beta below one are either less volatile or poorly correlated with the market.

Check out our latest analysis for China Aviation Oil (Singapore)

What does G92’s beta value mean to investors?

As it happens, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) has a five year beta of 0.95. This is fairly close to 1, so the stock has historically shown a somewhat similar level of volatility as the market. While history does not always repeat, this may indicate that the stock price will continue to be exposed to market risk, albeit not overly so. Many would argue that beta is useful in position sizing, but fundamental metrics such as revenue and earnings are more important overall. You can see China Aviation Oil (Singapore)’s revenue and earnings in the image below.

SGX:G92 Income Statement, February 23rd 2019
SGX:G92 Income Statement, February 23rd 2019

Does G92’s size influence the expected beta?

With a market capitalisation of S$1.2b, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) is a small cap stock. However, it is big enough to catch the attention of professional investors. Small companies often have a high beta value because the stock price can move on relatively low capital flows. So it’s interesting to note that this stock historically has a beta value quite close to one.

What this means for you:

China Aviation Oil (Singapore) has a beta value quite close to that of the overall market. That doesn’t tell us much on its own, so it is probably worth considering whether the company is growing, if you’re looking for stocks that will go up more than the overall market. In order to fully understand whether G92 is a good investment for you, we also need to consider important company-specific fundamentals such as China Aviation Oil (Singapore)’s financial health and performance track record. I highly recommend you dive deeper by considering the following:

  1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for G92’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for G92’s outlook.

  2. Past Track Record: Has G92 been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of G92’s historicals for more clarity.

  3. Other Interesting Stocks: It’s worth checking to see how G92 measures up against other companies on valuation. You could start with this free list of prospective options.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

Advertisement