U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    3,901.36
    +0.57 (+0.01%)
     
  • Dow 30

    31,261.90
    +8.77 (+0.03%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    11,354.62
    -33.88 (-0.30%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,773.27
    -2.96 (-0.17%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    110.35
    +0.46 (+0.42%)
     
  • Gold

    1,845.10
    +3.90 (+0.21%)
     
  • Silver

    21.76
    -0.14 (-0.65%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0562
    -0.0026 (-0.24%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.7870
    -0.0680 (-2.38%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2496
    +0.0021 (+0.17%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    127.8500
    +0.0560 (+0.04%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    29,392.15
    -917.38 (-3.03%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    650.34
    -23.03 (-3.42%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,389.98
    +87.24 (+1.19%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,739.03
    +336.19 (+1.27%)
     

Could The Danaos Corporation (NYSE:DAC) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls Danaos Corporation (NYSE:DAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

With a market capitalization of US$1.5b, Danaos is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Danaos.

View our latest analysis for Danaos

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Danaos?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Danaos. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Danaos' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It would appear that 5.5% of Danaos shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO John Coustas with 39% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 5.5% of the stock.

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Danaos

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Danaos Corporation. Insiders own US$597m worth of shares in the US$1.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

General Public Ownership

The general public holds a 23% stake in Danaos. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 13%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Danaos better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Danaos (2 are potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.