U.S. Markets closed

Cramer: Too Much Negativity on Earnings

Jim Cramer

EXCLUSIVE OFFER: See inside Jim Cramer’s multi-million dollar charitable trust portfolio to see the stocks he thinks could be potentially HUGE winners. Click here to see his holdings for FREE.

There's more good than bad in these earnings numbers.

Sure, IBM IBM was abysmal. Goldman Sachs GS didn't have enough fixed-income trading to make the numbers. EBay EBAY disappointed, as did Xilinx XLNX and UnitedHealth UNH . But let's go underneath. Let's look at the big hits, not just the misses.

I think you will find many more good than bad, including this morning's reports from General Electric GE , which had  been a real laggard, and Schlumberger SLB , a perpetual star. These two companies gave you exceptional global order growth and look clean. 

Consider the other contrasts. You may be worried about tech from IBM and Xilinx. But consider Google GOOG . This gigantic Internet search company has been stalled for the last six months, contributing little to the Nasdaq's historic run. It seemed like Google was just one more company that misjudged the speed with which people went mobile and didn't have the right ad tools to capitalize off of it. Now it seems that the company does have both the ad campaigns and the accelerated viewership, particularly on YouTube, that can be monetized, so there is a healthy and needed revaluation going on. Very clean quarter. Truly offsets whatever IBM has to say. 

Then how about the opposites to Goldman Sachs? JPMorgan Chase JPM , ex-litigation, gave you a terrific number, much better than Goldman's. American Express AXP was stupendous, frankly, calling into question the whole negative rap about the consumer that eBay offered. I thought Wells Fargo WFC wasn't perfect, but the market ate it up. Capital One COF shot the lights out. They all trump Goldman.

Or how about healthcare? Johnson & Johnson JNJ and Abbott ABT posted much-better-than-expected top and bottom lines. These were very strong quarters.

Coca-Cola KO wasn't that much to write home about, but the market didn't mind and it loved Pepsico's PEP quarter. Sure, Xilinx was a bummer, but Intel INTC , a much bigger company, delivered what the market wanted or it wouldn't be on the verge of breaking out.

Last night Chipotle CMG came through with numbers that had the stock vaulting nearly 8% premarket. Chipotle's been flying high of late, which worried me that somehow it would disappoint. But the same-store sales numbers came through very strong and the growth prospects, including new concepts like Chop House and new foods like Sofritas, the vegan dish, are just now beginning to roar.

I know there are numbers that show that we have had the most downside surprises in years, so far. But I think you need to look at three things to determine a downside surprise:

If you use that prism, I say so far, so very good.

Not a great run for the bears, even as I think they have already qualified the earnings season as a losing one.

  1. Did the top line miss?
  2. Did the bottom line miss?
  3. Did the stock do nothing or go up anyway?