U.S. Markets closed

Here’s What Crawford & Company’s (NYSE:CRD.B) P/E Is Telling Us

Walter Gay

This article is written for those who want to get better at using price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll look at Crawford & Company’s (NYSE:CRD.B) P/E ratio and reflect on what it tells us about the company’s share price. Crawford has a price to earnings ratio of 41.45, based on the last twelve months. In other words, at today’s prices, investors are paying $41.45 for every $1 in prior year profit.

Check out our latest analysis for Crawford

How Do You Calculate A P/E Ratio?

The formula for P/E is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Share Price ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Crawford:

P/E of 41.45 = $9 ÷ $0.22 (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying a higher price for each $1 of company earnings. All else being equal, it’s better to pay a low price — but as Warren Buffett said, ‘It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.’

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Probably the most important factor in determining what P/E a company trades on is the earnings growth. Earnings growth means that in the future the ‘E’ will be higher. Therefore, even if you pay a high multiple of earnings now, that multiple will become lower in the future. So while a stock may look expensive based on past earnings, it could be cheap based on future earnings.

Crawford’s earnings per share fell by 68% in the last twelve months. But EPS is up 68% over the last 3 years. And over the longer term (5 years) earnings per share have decreased 15% annually. This growth rate might warrant a below average P/E ratio.

How Does Crawford’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio indicates whether the market has higher or lower expectations of a company. As you can see below, Crawford has a much higher P/E than the average company (13) in the insurance industry.

NYSE:CRD.B PE PEG Gauge December 25th 18

Its relatively high P/E ratio indicates that Crawford shareholders think it will perform better than other companies in its industry classification. Clearly the market expects growth, but it isn’t guaranteed. So investors should always consider the P/E ratio alongside other factors, such as whether company directors have been buying shares.

Remember: P/E Ratios Don’t Consider The Balance Sheet

The ‘Price’ in P/E reflects the market capitalization of the company. That means it doesn’t take debt or cash into account. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Such expenditure might be good or bad, in the long term, but the point here is that the balance sheet is not reflected by this ratio.

Is Debt Impacting Crawford’s P/E?

Net debt totals 32% of Crawford’s market cap. If you want to compare its P/E ratio to other companies, you should absolutely keep in mind it has significant borrowings.

The Verdict On Crawford’s P/E Ratio

Crawford has a P/E of 41.5. That’s higher than the average in the US market, which is 15.6. With some debt but no EPS growth last year, the market has high expectations of future profits.

Investors have an opportunity when market expectations about a stock are wrong. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, ‘In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.’ So this free visual report on analyst forecasts could hold they key to an excellent investment decision.

But note: Crawford may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with strong recent earnings growth (and a P/E ratio below 20).

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.