U.S. Markets closed

# Is Danaos Corporation’s (NYSE:DAC) PE Ratio A Signal To Buy For Investors?

I am writing today to help inform people who are new to the stock market and want to start learning about core concepts of fundamental analysis on practical examples from today’s market.

Danaos Corporation (NYSE:DAC) is trading with a trailing P/E of 2.1x, which is lower than the industry average of 15.6x. While this makes DAC appear like a great stock to buy, you might change your mind after I explain the assumptions behind the P/E ratio. Today, I will deconstruct the P/E ratio and highlight what you need to be careful of when using the P/E ratio.

### What you need to know about the P/E ratio

P/E is a popular ratio used for relative valuation. It compares a stock’s price per share to the stock’s earnings per share. A more intuitive way of understanding the P/E ratio is to think of it as how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

P/E Calculation for DAC

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

DAC Price-Earnings Ratio = \$1.55 ÷ \$0.733 = 2.1x

The P/E ratio isn’t a metric you view in isolation and only becomes useful when you compare it against other similar companies. We preferably want to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar features to DAC, such as capital structure and profitability. A quick method of creating a peer group is to use companies in the same industry, which is what I will do. At 2.1, DAC’s P/E is lower than its industry peers (15.6). This implies that investors are undervaluing each dollar of DAC’s earnings. This multiple is a median of profitable companies of 24 Shipping companies in US including Seaspan, Matson and Pangaea Logistics Solutions. One could put it like this: the market is pricing DAC as if it is a weaker company than the average company in its industry.

### Assumptions to watch out for

However, there are two important assumptions you should be aware of. The first is that our “similar companies” are actually similar to DAC, or else the difference in P/E might be a result of other factors. For example, if you compared higher growth firms with DAC, then its P/E would naturally be lower since investors would reward its peers’ higher growth with a higher price. The second assumption that must hold true is that the stocks we are comparing DAC to are fairly valued by the market. If this is violated, DAC’s P/E may be lower than its peers as they are actually overvalued by investors.

### What this means for you:

Since you may have already conducted your due diligence on DAC, the undervaluation of the stock may mean it is a good time to top up on your current holdings. But at the end of the day, keep in mind that relative valuation relies heavily on critical assumptions I’ve outlined above. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for DAC’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for DAC’s outlook.
2. Past Track Record: Has DAC been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of DAC’s historicals for more clarity.
3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.