U.S. Markets closed

Despite Its High P/E Ratio, Is CyberOptics Corporation (NASDAQ:CYBE) Still Undervalued?

Andy Nguyen

This article is written for those who want to get better at using price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll show how you can use CyberOptics Corporation’s (NASDAQ:CYBE) P/E ratio to inform your assessment of the investment opportunity. CyberOptics has a price to earnings ratio of 64.54, based on the last twelve months. In other words, at today’s prices, investors are paying $64.54 for every $1 in prior year profit.

Check out our latest analysis for CyberOptics

How Do You Calculate A P/E Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Share Price ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for CyberOptics:

P/E of 64.54 = $19.7 ÷ $0.31 (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying a higher price for each $1 of company earnings. That is not a good or a bad thing per se, but a high P/E does imply buyers are optimistic about the future.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

P/E ratios primarily reflect market expectations around earnings growth rates. When earnings grow, the ‘E’ increases, over time. Therefore, even if you pay a high multiple of earnings now, that multiple will become lower in the future. So while a stock may look expensive based on past earnings, it could be cheap based on future earnings.

CyberOptics saw earnings per share decrease by 69% last year. But EPS is up 60% over the last 5 years.

How Does CyberOptics’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio indicates whether the market has higher or lower expectations of a company. You can see in the image below that the average P/E (17.5) for companies in the semiconductor industry is a lot lower than CyberOptics’s P/E.

NASDAQGM:CYBE PE PEG Gauge January 28th 19

That means that the market expects CyberOptics will outperform other companies in its industry. The market is optimistic about the future, but that doesn’t guarantee future growth. So investors should delve deeper. I like to check if company insiders have been buying or selling.

Remember: P/E Ratios Don’t Consider The Balance Sheet

It’s important to note that the P/E ratio considers the market capitalization, not the enterprise value. In other words, it does not consider any debt or cash that the company may have on the balance sheet. Hypothetically, a company could reduce its future P/E ratio by spending its cash (or taking on debt) to achieve higher earnings.

Such expenditure might be good or bad, in the long term, but the point here is that the balance sheet is not reflected by this ratio.

How Does CyberOptics’s Debt Impact Its P/E Ratio?

Since CyberOptics holds net cash of US$14m, it can spend on growth, justifying a higher P/E ratio than otherwise.

The Bottom Line On CyberOptics’s P/E Ratio

CyberOptics has a P/E of 64.5. That’s significantly higher than the average in the US market, which is 16.7. The recent drop in earnings per share would make some investors cautious, but the net cash position means the company has time to improve: and the high P/E suggests the market thinks it will.

Investors should be looking to buy stocks that the market is wrong about. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, ‘In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.’ So this free visualization of the analyst consensus on future earnings could help you make the right decision about whether to buy, sell, or hold.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.