Did Old Second Bancorp Inc (NASDAQ:OSBC) Create Value For Shareholders?

With an ROE of 12.17%, Old Second Bancorp Inc (NASDAQ:OSBC) outpaced its own industry which delivered a less exciting 8.91% over the past year. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that OSBC has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. In this article, we’ll closely examine some factors like financial leverage to evaluate the sustainability of OSBC’s ROE. View our latest analysis for Old Second Bancorp

Breaking down ROE — the mother of all ratios

Return on Equity (ROE) weighs Old Second Bancorp’s profit against the level of its shareholders’ equity. It essentially shows how much the company can generate in earnings given the amount of equity it has raised. While a higher ROE is preferred in most cases, there are several other factors we should consider before drawing any conclusions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

Returns are usually compared to costs to measure the efficiency of capital. Old Second Bancorp’s cost of equity is 9.76%. This means Old Second Bancorp returns enough to cover its own cost of equity, with a buffer of 2.41%. This sustainable practice implies that the company pays less for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be dissected into three distinct ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

NasdaqGS:OSBC Last Perf Jan 22nd 18
NasdaqGS:OSBC Last Perf Jan 22nd 18

The first component is profit margin, which measures how much of sales is retained after the company pays for all its expenses. Asset turnover shows how much revenue Old Second Bancorp can generate with its current asset base. And finally, financial leverage is simply how much of assets are funded by equity, which exhibits how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since ROE can be inflated by excessive debt, we need to examine Old Second Bancorp’s debt-to-equity level. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a balanced 126.28%, which means its above-average ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

NasdaqGS:OSBC Historical Debt Jan 22nd 18
NasdaqGS:OSBC Historical Debt Jan 22nd 18

Next Steps:

ROE is a simple yet informative ratio, illustrating the various components that each measure the quality of the overall stock. Old Second Bancorp exhibits a strong ROE against its peers, as well as sufficient returns to cover its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. Although ROE can be a useful metric, it is only a small part of diligent research.

For Old Second Bancorp, there are three key aspects you should look at:

1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

2. Valuation: What is Old Second Bancorp worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Old Second Bancorp is currently mispriced by the market.

3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Old Second Bancorp? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement