U.S. Markets closed

How Did Renasant Corporation’s (NASDAQ:RNST) 6.66% ROE Fare Against The Industry?

Gabriel Boyd

Renasant Corporation (NASDAQ:RNST) generated a below-average return on equity of 6.66% in the past 12 months, while its industry returned 8.48%. Though RNST’s recent performance is underwhelming, it is useful to understand what ROE is made up of and how it should be interpreted. Knowing these components can change your views on RNST’s below-average returns. Today I will look at how components such as financial leverage can influence ROE which may impact the sustainability of RNST’s returns. View our latest analysis for Renasant

Peeling the layers of ROE – trisecting a company’s profitability

Return on Equity (ROE) is a measure of Renasant’s profit relative to its shareholders’ equity. For example, if the company invests $1 in the form of equity, it will generate $0.07 in earnings from this. In most cases, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are many other factors we must consider prior to making any investment decisions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is measured against cost of equity in order to determine the efficiency of Renasant’s equity capital deployed. Its cost of equity is 9.90%. Since Renasant’s return does not cover its cost, with a difference of -3.25%, this means its current use of equity is not efficient and not sustainable. Very simply, Renasant pays more for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be split up into three useful ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

NasdaqGS:RNST Last Perf May 22nd 18

Essentially, profit margin shows how much money the company makes after paying for all its expenses. Asset turnover shows how much revenue Renasant can generate with its current asset base. And finally, financial leverage is simply how much of assets are funded by equity, which exhibits how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since ROE can be inflated by excessive debt, we need to examine Renasant’s debt-to-equity level. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a low 17.69%, which means Renasant still has headroom to take on more leverage in order to increase profits.

NasdaqGS:RNST Historical Debt May 22nd 18

Next Steps:

ROE is one of many ratios which meaningfully dissects financial statements, which illustrates the quality of a company. Renasant’s below-industry ROE is disappointing, furthermore, its returns were not even high enough to cover its own cost of equity. However, ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of returns, which has headroom to increase further. Although ROE can be a useful metric, it is only a small part of diligent research.

For Renasant, there are three relevant factors you should look at:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.
  2. Valuation: What is Renasant worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Renasant is currently mispriced by the market.
  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Renasant? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.