U.S. Markets open in 1 hr 59 mins

Does Dino Polska SA’s (WSE:DNP) PE Ratio Warrant A Sell?

Blake Harford

I am writing today to help inform people who are new to the stock market and want to learn about the link between company’s fundamentals and stock market performance.

Dino Polska SA (WSE:DNP) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 34.7, which is higher than the industry average of 18.4. While this might not seem positive, it is important to understand the assumptions behind the P/E ratio before you make any investment decisions. Today, I will break down what the P/E ratio is, how to interpret it and what to watch out for.

View our latest analysis for Dino Polska

Demystifying the P/E ratio

WSE:DNP PE PEG Gauge August 30th 18

The P/E ratio is one of many ratios used in relative valuation. By comparing a stock’s price per share to its earnings per share, we are able to see how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

P/E Calculation for DNP

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

DNP Price-Earnings Ratio = PLN93 ÷ PLN2.677 = 34.7x

On its own, the P/E ratio doesn’t tell you much; however, it becomes extremely useful when you compare it with other similar companies. We preferably want to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar features to DNP, such as capital structure and profitability. A common peer group is companies that exist in the same industry, which is what I use. Since DNP’s P/E of 34.7 is higher than its industry peers (18.4), it means that investors are paying more for each dollar of DNP’s earnings. Since the Consumer Retailing sector in PL is relatively small, I’ve included similar companies in the wider region in order to get a better idea of the multiple, which is a median of profitable companies of companies such as North Coast, Emperia Holding and Atlanta Poland. You could also say that the market is suggesting that DNP is a stronger business than the average comparable company.

Assumptions to watch out for

However, it is important to note that our examination of the stock is based on certain assumptions. The first is that our “similar companies” are actually similar to DNP. If not, the difference in P/E might be a result of other factors. Take, for example, the scenario where Dino Polska SA is growing profits more quickly than the average comparable company. In that case, the market may be correct to value it on a higher P/E ratio. We should also be aware that the stocks we are comparing to DNP may not be fairly valued. So while we can reasonably surmise that it is optimistically valued relative to a peer group, it might be fairly valued, if the peer group is undervalued.

What this means for you:

If your personal research into the stock confirms what the P/E ratio is telling you, it might be a good time to rebalance your portfolio and reduce your holdings in DNP. But keep in mind that the usefulness of relative valuation depends on whether you are comfortable with making the assumptions I mentioned above. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for DNP’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for DNP’s outlook.
  2. Financial Health: Are DNP’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.
  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.