U.S. Markets open in 1 hr 54 mins

What Does Transat AT Inc’s (TSE:TRZ) PE Ratio Tell You?

This article is intended for those of you who are at the beginning of your investing journey and want to begin learning about how to value company based on its current earnings and what are the drawbacks of this method.

Transat AT Inc (TSE:TRZ) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 1.7x, which is lower than the industry average of 16.1x. While this makes TRZ appear like a great stock to buy, you might change your mind after I explain the assumptions behind the P/E ratio. In this article, I will break down what the P/E ratio is, how to interpret it and what to watch out for.

View our latest analysis for Transat A.T

What you need to know about the P/E ratio

TSX:TRZ PE PEG Gauge October 13th 18

P/E is often used for relative valuation since earnings power is a chief driver of investment value. It compares a stock’s price per share to the stock’s earnings per share. A more intuitive way of understanding the P/E ratio is to think of it as how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

P/E Calculation for TRZ

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

TRZ Price-Earnings Ratio = CA$6.75 ÷ CA$3.865 = 1.7x

The P/E ratio itself doesn’t tell you a lot; however, it becomes very insightful when you compare it with other similar companies. We want to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar characteristics as TRZ, such as size and country of operation. A common peer group is companies that exist in the same industry, which is what I use. TRZ’s P/E of 1.7 is lower than its industry peers (16.1), which implies that each dollar of TRZ’s earnings is being undervalued by investors. This multiple is a median of profitable companies of 12 Hospitality companies in CA including Evergreen Gaming, Pizza Pizza Royalty and Sportscene Group. You can think of it like this: the market is suggesting that TRZ is a weaker business than the average comparable company.

Assumptions to watch out for

However, it is important to note that this conclusion is based on two key assumptions. The first is that our “similar companies” are actually similar to TRZ, or else the difference in P/E might be a result of other factors. For example, if you compared lower risk firms with TRZ, then investors would naturally value it at a lower price since it is a riskier investment. The second assumption that must hold true is that the stocks we are comparing TRZ to are fairly valued by the market. If this is violated, TRZ’s P/E may be lower than its peers as they are actually overvalued by investors.

What this means for you:

You may have already conducted fundamental analysis on the stock as a shareholder, so its current undervaluation could signal a good buying opportunity to increase your exposure to TRZ. Now that you understand the ins and outs of the PE metric, you should know to bear in mind its limitations before you make an investment decision. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I highly recommend you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for TRZ’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for TRZ’s outlook.
  2. Past Track Record: Has TRZ been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of TRZ’s historicals for more clarity.
  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.