U.S. Markets close in 3 hrs 34 mins

Is Dunelm Group plc’s (LON:DNLM) 64.77% ROE Strong Compared To Its Industry?

Collin Greene

Dunelm Group plc (LSE:DNLM) delivered an ROE of 64.77% over the past 12 months, which is an impressive feat relative to its industry average of 12.82% during the same period. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that DNLM has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. Today, we’ll take a closer look at some factors like financial leverage to see how sustainable DNLM’s ROE is. Check out our latest analysis for Dunelm Group

What you must know about ROE

Return on Equity (ROE) is a measure of Dunelm Group’s profit relative to its shareholders’ equity. For example, if the company invests £1 in the form of equity, it will generate £0.65 in earnings from this. While a higher ROE is preferred in most cases, there are several other factors we should consider before drawing any conclusions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is measured against cost of equity in order to determine the efficiency of Dunelm Group’s equity capital deployed. Its cost of equity is 8.30%. Since Dunelm Group’s return covers its cost in excess of 56.47%, its use of equity capital is efficient and likely to be sustainable. Simply put, Dunelm Group pays less for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be broken down into three different ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

LSE:DNLM Last Perf Mar 27th 18

Essentially, profit margin shows how much money the company makes after paying for all its expenses. The other component, asset turnover, illustrates how much revenue Dunelm Group can make from its asset base. And finally, financial leverage is simply how much of assets are funded by equity, which exhibits how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since ROE can be artificially increased through excessive borrowing, we should check Dunelm Group’s historic debt-to-equity ratio. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a balanced 131.11%, which means its above-average ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

LSE:DNLM Historical Debt Mar 27th 18

Next Steps:

ROE is one of many ratios which meaningfully dissects financial statements, which illustrates the quality of a company. Dunelm Group exhibits a strong ROE against its peers, as well as sufficient returns to cover its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. Although ROE can be a useful metric, it is only a small part of diligent research.

For Dunelm Group, I’ve compiled three relevant aspects you should further examine:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.
  2. Valuation: What is Dunelm Group worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Dunelm Group is currently mispriced by the market.
  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Dunelm Group? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.