U.S. Markets open in 7 hrs 21 mins
  • S&P Futures

    3,224.25
    -7.00 (-0.22%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    26,632.00
    -53.00 (-0.20%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    10,781.25
    -47.75 (-0.44%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,449.10
    +2.40 (+0.17%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    39.73
    -0.20 (-0.50%)
     
  • Gold

    1,855.50
    -12.90 (-0.69%)
     
  • Silver

    22.05
    -1.06 (-4.59%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1663
    +0.0001 (+0.0117%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    0.6760
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Vix

    28.58
    +1.72 (+6.40%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2711
    -0.0015 (-0.1144%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    10,311.08
    +61.61 (+0.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    208.85
    -5.12 (-2.39%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    5,899.26
    +69.80 (+1.20%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    23,077.24
    -269.25 (-1.15%)
     

The EU Needs Banks to Merge Across Borders

Ferdinando Giugliano

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The euro region has taken several steps to centralize banking regulation and supervision, but there is little sign that lenders are interested in seeking to merge beyond national borders. Two recent deals — one has been proposed in Spain, the other occurred in Italy — show that, for all the good intentions, Europe’s “banking union” remains incomplete.

The European Central Bank — the euro zone’s top supervisor — will be content with domestic mergers for now, since these can still help reduce excess capacity in an overcrowded industry. But politicians and regulators must redouble efforts to harmonize the rules in the monetary union, so that bankers have more reasons to look abroad. The euro area needs more cross-border mergers not just as a further show of unity, but as an essential step to boost financial stability.

Yet domestic mergers are still the only game in town. Two weeks ago, CaixaBank SA and Bankia SA said they were exploring an all-share deal that would create Spain’s largest domestic bank. The announcement came only weeks after Intesa Sanpaolo SpA took over rival Ubi Banca SpA to become Italy’s largest lender by assets.

There is no doubt that, especially during times of crisis, the most obvious combinations are those not far from home. The easiest rationale for merging banks is that cutting costs and redundant branch networks can yield significant savings.

However, cross-border mergers offer excellent opportunities for revenue diversification. These may be less obvious during a pan-European recession, but they are especially helpful when an economic shock hits one market more than others.

The ECB has no preference between domestic and cross-border mergers. A national combination can help increase a country’s financial stability when it leads to higher profitability or combines a stronger bank with a shakier competitor. In theory, allowing weak banks to exit the market in an orderly way can also reduce systemic vulnerabilities, but Europe has proved stubbornly incapable of letting lenders fail. A merger is often the only realistic alternative.

But transnational deals offer additional gains to supervisors: Above all, they can loosen the dangerous ties between a bank and its home state. This means that when a country is in trouble, the lender will suffer less; and when the bank is in poor shape, its difficulties will be spread across different economies. This diffusion can be particularly beneficial in the euro zone, since a shared currency and monetary policy means individual governments have fewer tools to address isolated crises.

The ECB has not been shy to emphasize the advantages of cross-border mergers, and yet they are still proving elusive. Banks are fearful that efficiency gains won’t materialize, given the difficulty of operating in different countries with language and cultural barriers. National supervisors may also have a preference for ring-fencing their own domestic markets, so that they do not have to worry about rescuing foreign subsidiaries. Most politicians hate a takeover of a domestic bank from abroad, as they fear losing influence over a key lever of the economy.

In July, the ECB launched a public consultation to clarify its approach on mergers. It is seeking to reassure lenders about the supervisory demands for new capital, which bankers believe are too high and uncertain, and have hence stood as an important obstacle to cross-border combinations.

Politicians must do their part too, for example, by stepping up efforts to create a single deposit guarantee scheme across the monetary union. This will reassure national supervisors that there is a broader European safety net should any bank get into serious trouble. Olaf Scholz, Germany’s finance minister, called for this in a 2019 article for the Financial Times, but, as I had feared at the time, there has been limited progress made since.

The pandemic has prompted European leaders to break taboos. Consider, for example, the creation of a joint recovery fund to support countries in crisis. Europe’s lenders could do with the same spirit.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Ferdinando Giugliano writes columns on European economics for Bloomberg Opinion. He is also an economics columnist for La Repubblica and was a member of the editorial board of the Financial Times.

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion

Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.

©2020 Bloomberg L.P.