U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,128.80
    +31.63 (+0.77%)
     
  • Dow 30

    33,800.60
    +297.03 (+0.89%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    13,900.19
    +70.88 (+0.51%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,243.47
    +0.88 (+0.04%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    59.34
    -0.26 (-0.44%)
     
  • Gold

    1,744.10
    -14.10 (-0.80%)
     
  • Silver

    25.33
    -0.26 (-1.02%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1905
    -0.0016 (-0.13%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.6660
    +0.0340 (+2.08%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3706
    -0.0029 (-0.21%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    109.6500
    +0.3860 (+0.35%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    59,708.79
    +1,161.23 (+1.98%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,235.89
    +8.34 (+0.68%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    6,915.75
    -26.47 (-0.38%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    29,768.06
    +59.08 (+0.20%)
     

Goldman Sachs loses legal fight against EU cartel fine

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Foo Yun Chee
·1 min read
FILE PHOTO: Goldman Sachs sign is seen above floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the opening bell in the Manhattan borough of New York
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

By Foo Yun Chee

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs on Wednesday lost its fight against an EU cartel fine handed down to its former Italian subsidiary and cable maker Prysmian after Europe's top court said it was liable for the actions of the unit.

Prysmian was fined 104.6 million euros ($127 million) by EU antitrust regulators in 2014 for taking part in a cartel with 10 other cable makers.

Its penalty included a joint fine of 37.3 million euros with Goldman Sachs, which had acquired the Italian company via one of its private equity funds in 2005 but has since sold its holding.

The European Commission in its 2014 decision said Goldman Sachs, as the parent company, had decisive influence over Prysmian. A lower EU tribunal in 2018 backed its argument.

The Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) agreed with the reasoning and rejected Goldman Sachs' appeal.

"The General Court did not err in law in finding that, in the present case, the Commission was entitled to rely on a presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence in order to establish the appellant's liability for the infringement at issue in relation to the pre-IPO period," CJEU judges said.

The case is C-595/18 P The Goldman Sachs Group v Commission.

($1 = 0.8232 euros)

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee. Editing by Mark Potter)