U.S. Markets closed

How Good Is CPI Aerostructures, Inc. (NYSEMKT:CVU) At Creating Shareholder Value?

Andy Nguyen

Today we’ll evaluate CPI Aerostructures, Inc. (NYSEMKT:CVU) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. Specifically, we’re going to calculate its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), in the hopes of getting some insight into the business.

First of all, we’ll work out how to calculate ROCE. Second, we’ll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. And finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. All else being equal, a better business will have a higher ROCE. In brief, it is a useful tool, but it is not without drawbacks. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since ‘No two businesses are exactly alike.’

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for CPI Aerostructures:

0.11 = US$10m ÷ (US$127m – US$42m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Therefore, CPI Aerostructures has an ROCE of 11%.

See our latest analysis for CPI Aerostructures

Want to help shape the future of investing tools? Participate in a short research study and receive a 6-month subscription to the award winning Simply Wall St research tool (valued at $60)!

Does CPI Aerostructures Have A Good ROCE?

ROCE is commonly used for comparing the performance of similar businesses. Using our data, CPI Aerostructures’s ROCE appears to be around the 12% average of the Aerospace & Defense industry. Separate from CPI Aerostructures’s performance relative to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms looks satisfactory, and it may be worth researching in more depth.

AMEX:CVU Last Perf January 29th 19

When considering this metric, keep in mind that it is backwards looking, and not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be deceptive for cyclical businesses, as returns can look incredible in boom times, and terribly low in downturns. ROCE is, after all, simply a snap shot of a single year. Since the future is so important for investors, you should check out our free report on analyst forecasts for CPI Aerostructures.

CPI Aerostructures’s Current Liabilities And Their Impact On Its ROCE

Current liabilities are short term bills and invoices that need to be paid in 12 months or less. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

CPI Aerostructures has total assets of US$127m and current liabilities of US$42m. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 33% of its total assets. CPI Aerostructures has a medium level of current liabilities, which would boost the ROCE.

The Bottom Line On CPI Aerostructures’s ROCE

With a decent ROCE, the company could be interesting, but remember that the level of current liabilities make the ROCE look better. You might be able to find a better buy than CPI Aerostructures. If you want a selection of possible winners, check out this free list of interesting companies that trade on a P/E below 20 (but have proven they can grow earnings).

I will like CPI Aerostructures better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.