(Bloomberg) -- Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world embroiled in trade wars. Sign up here.
A Republican member of the Senate Banking Committee called for the panel to hold a hearing on what he termed the danger that the Federal Reserve will meddle in the 2020 presidential election, a day after a former top central bank official suggested that the Fed resist interest-rate cuts that would aid Donald Trump.
Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said Wednesday that he was “very disappointed” that New York Fed President Bill Dudley appeared to be “lobbying the Fed to use its authority as a political weapon against President Trump,” according to a statement.
“The president is standing up for America against China after 30 years of our country and our workers being ripped off and there is now an effort to get the Fed to try to sabotage the president’s efforts,” Tillis said.
He called for a hearing “regarding Fed independence and the danger of this institution taking unprecedented and inappropriate steps to meddle in the presidential election.”
Dudley on Tuesday suggested in a Bloomberg Opinion piece that the central bank resist interest-rate cuts that would help Trump’s re-election prospects. He drew swift criticism from analysts and economists that such an approach would jeopardize the independence of a Fed already under fierce attack from the U.S. president.
“Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the U.S. and global economy,” wrote Dudley, who headed the New York Fed from 2009 to 2018 and served as vice chairman of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. “If the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, then Fed officials should consider how their decisions will affect the political outcome in 2020.”
The Fed issued a statement Tuesday in response to Dudley’s column, rejecting the suggestion that it would play politics with monetary policy. “The Federal Reserve’s policy decisions are guided solely by its congressional mandate to maintain price stability and maximum employment. Political considerations play absolutely no role,” Fed spokeswoman Michelle Smith said.
Mark Spindel, co-author of a book that examines the notion of Fed independence, called Tillis’ call for a hearing “another example of the way Congressional threats of intervention can put further pressure on the Fed.”
Tillis, who is up for re-election next year, said in June that Trump “should look at everything he can do within his legal authority" in dealing with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, whom the president appointed to the post.
That followed the revelation that Trump had explored the legality of removing Powell from the Fed’s chairmanship.
(Updates with analyst’s comment in eighth paragraph.)
To contact the reporters on this story: Rich Miller in Washington at email@example.com;Christopher Condon in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Scott Lanman at email@example.com, Jeff Kearns, Margaret Collins
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.