U.S. Markets close in 4 hrs 14 mins

# Here's What Logistec Corporation's (TSE:LGT.B) P/E Is Telling Us

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a \$250 gift card!

The goal of this article is to teach you how to use price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We'll look at Logistec Corporation's (TSE:LGT.B) P/E ratio and reflect on what it tells us about the company's share price. Logistec has a price to earnings ratio of 28.78, based on the last twelve months. In other words, at today's prices, investors are paying CA\$28.78 for every CA\$1 in prior year profit.

### How Do I Calculate A Price To Earnings Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Price per Share Ã· Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Logistec:

P/E of 28.78 = CA\$42.3 Ã· CA\$1.47 (Based on the year to March 2019.)

### Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio implies that investors pay a higher price for the earning power of the business. All else being equal, it's better to pay a low price -- but as Warren Buffett said, 'It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.'

### How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Companies that shrink earnings per share quickly will rapidly decrease the 'E' in the equation. Therefore, even if you pay a low multiple of earnings now, that multiple will become higher in the future. Then, a higher P/E might scare off shareholders, pushing the share price down.

Logistec saw earnings per share decrease by 6.7% last year. And it has shrunk its earnings per share by 8.8% per year over the last five years. So we might expect a relatively low P/E.

### Does Logistec Have A Relatively High Or Low P/E For Its Industry?

We can get an indication of market expectations by looking at the P/E ratio. You can see in the image below that the average P/E (28.8) for companies in the infrastructure industry is roughly the same as Logistec's P/E.

Logistec's P/E tells us that market participants think its prospects are roughly in line with its industry. If the company has better than average prospects, then the market might be underestimating it. I inform my view byby checking management tenure and remuneration, among other things.

### Don't Forget: The P/E Does Not Account For Debt or Bank Deposits

One drawback of using a P/E ratio is that it considers market capitalization, but not the balance sheet. Thus, the metric does not reflect cash or debt held by the company. The exact same company would hypothetically deserve a higher P/E ratio if it had a strong balance sheet, than if it had a weak one with lots of debt, because a cashed up company can spend on growth.

Such expenditure might be good or bad, in the long term, but the point here is that the balance sheet is not reflected by this ratio.

### How Does Logistec's Debt Impact Its P/E Ratio?

Net debt is 47% of Logistec's market cap. While that's enough to warrant consideration, it doesn't really concern us.

### The Verdict On Logistec's P/E Ratio

Logistec's P/E is 28.8 which is above average (14.8) in the CA market. With a bit of debt, but a lack of recent growth, it's safe to say the market is expecting improved profit performance from the company, in the next few years.

Investors have an opportunity when market expectations about a stock are wrong. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, 'In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.' We don't have analyst forecasts, but shareholders might want to examine this detailed historical graph of earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But note: Logistec may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with strong recent earnings growth (and a P/E ratio below 20).

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.