U.S. markets open in 4 hours 43 minutes
  • S&P Futures

    -4.75 (-0.13%)
  • Dow Futures

    -78.00 (-0.26%)
  • Nasdaq Futures

    -11.25 (-0.09%)
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    -3.90 (-0.21%)
  • Crude Oil

    +0.16 (+0.36%)
  • Gold

    +8.60 (+0.47%)
  • Silver

    +0.15 (+0.62%)

    -0.0019 (-0.16%)
  • 10-Yr Bond

    0.0000 (0.00%)
  • Vix

    +0.32 (+1.56%)

    -0.0055 (-0.41%)

    +0.3280 (+0.31%)

    -3.71 (-0.02%)
  • CMC Crypto 200

    -3.92 (-1.03%)
  • FTSE 100

    +6.62 (+0.10%)
  • Nikkei 225

    +13.44 (+0.05%)

How Home Bancorp Inc (HBCP) Delivered A Better ROE Than Its Industry

Renee Allred

Home Bancorp Inc (NASDAQ:HBCP) delivered an ROE of 10.00% over the past 12 months, which is an impressive feat relative to its industry average of 7.15% during the same period. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that HBCP has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. We’ll take a closer look today at factors like financial leverage to determine whether HBCP’s ROE is actually sustainable. Check out our latest analysis for Home Bancorp

Peeling the layers of ROE – trisecting a company’s profitability

Firstly, Return on Equity, or ROE, is simply the percentage of last years’ earning against the book value of shareholders’ equity. An ROE of 10.00% implies $0.1 returned on every $1 invested. In most cases, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are many other factors we must consider prior to making any investment decisions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

Returns are usually compared to costs to measure the efficiency of capital. HBCP’s cost of equity is 9.22%. Since HBCP’s return covers its cost in excess of 0.78%, its use of equity capital is efficient and likely to be sustainable. Simply put, HBCP pays less for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be dissected into three distinct ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

NasdaqGS:HBCP Last Perf Oct 7th 17
NasdaqGS:HBCP Last Perf Oct 7th 17

The first component is profit margin, which measures how much of sales is retained after the company pays for all its expenses. The other component, asset turnover, illustrates how much revenue HBCP can make from its asset base. The most interesting ratio, and reflective of sustainability of its ROE, is financial leverage. Since financial leverage can artificially inflate ROE, we need to look at how much debt HBCP currently has. At 35.72%, HBCP’s debt-to-equity ratio appears low and indicates the above-average ROE is generated from its capacity to increase profit without a large debt burden.

NasdaqGS:HBCP Historical Debt Oct 7th 17
NasdaqGS:HBCP Historical Debt Oct 7th 17

What this means for you:

Are you a shareholder? HBCP exhibits a strong ROE against its peers, as well as sufficient returns to cover its cost of equity. Since its high ROE is not likely driven by high debt, it might be a good time to top up on your current holdings if your fundamental research reaffirms this analysis. If you're looking for new ideas for high-returning stocks, you should take a look at our free platform to see the list of stocks with Return on Equity over 20%.

Are you a potential investor? If you are considering investing in HBCP, basing your decision on ROE alone is certainly not sufficient. I recommend you do additional fundamental analysis by looking through our most recent infographic report on Home Bancorp to help you make a more informed investment decision.

To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.