Is IEC Electronics Corp’s (NYSEMKT:IEC) PE Ratio A Signal To Sell For Investors?

This article is intended for those of you who are at the beginning of your investing journey and want to better understand how you can grow your money by investing in IEC Electronics Corp (NYSEMKT:IEC).

IEC Electronics Corp (NYSEMKT:IEC) is trading with a trailing P/E of 25.3x, which is higher than the industry average of 22.3x. Although some investors may jump to the conclusion that you should avoid the stock or sell if you own it, understanding the assumptions behind the P/E ratio might change your mind. Today, I will deconstruct the P/E ratio and highlight what you need to be careful of when using the P/E ratio. See our latest analysis for IEC Electronics

Demystifying the P/E ratio

AMEX:IEC PE PEG Gauge June 22nd 18
AMEX:IEC PE PEG Gauge June 22nd 18

P/E is often used for relative valuation since earnings power is a chief driver of investment value. It compares a stock’s price per share to the stock’s earnings per share. A more intuitive way of understanding the P/E ratio is to think of it as how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

P/E Calculation for IEC

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

IEC Price-Earnings Ratio = $6.5 ÷ $0.257 = 25.3x

On its own, the P/E ratio doesn’t tell you much; however, it becomes extremely useful when you compare it with other similar companies. We want to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar characteristics as IEC, such as size and country of operation. One way of gathering a peer group is to use firms in the same industry, which is what I’ll do. At 25.3x, IEC’s P/E is higher than its industry peers (22.3x). This implies that investors are overvaluing each dollar of IEC’s earnings. Therefore, according to this analysis, IEC is an over-priced stock.

Assumptions to watch out for

While our conclusion might prompt you to sell your IEC shares immediately, there are two important assumptions you should be aware of. The first is that our “similar companies” are actually similar to IEC, or else the difference in P/E might be a result of other factors. For example, if you compared lower risk firms with IEC, then investors would naturally value it at a lower price since it is a riskier investment. The second assumption that must hold true is that the stocks we are comparing IEC to are fairly valued by the market. If this is violated, IEC’s P/E may be lower than its peers as they are actually overvalued by investors.

What this means for you:

Since you may have already conducted your due diligence on IEC, the overvaluation of the stock may mean it is a good time to reduce your current holdings. But at the end of the day, keep in mind that relative valuation relies heavily on critical assumptions I’ve outlined above. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for IEC’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for IEC’s outlook.

  2. Past Track Record: Has IEC been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of IEC’s historicals for more clarity.

  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement