U.S. markets open in 2 hours 31 minutes
  • S&P Futures

    4,277.00
    -30.75 (-0.71%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    33,938.00
    -180.00 (-0.53%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    13,545.25
    -113.00 (-0.83%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,008.00
    -15.30 (-0.76%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    86.52
    -0.01 (-0.01%)
     
  • Gold

    1,786.30
    -3.40 (-0.19%)
     
  • Silver

    19.85
    -0.23 (-1.15%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0178
    +0.0007 (+0.07%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.8240
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Vix

    20.39
    +0.44 (+2.21%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2103
    +0.0009 (+0.07%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    134.9630
    +0.7480 (+0.56%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    23,768.00
    -259.60 (-1.08%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    566.10
    -5.82 (-1.02%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,505.90
    -30.16 (-0.40%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    29,222.77
    +353.86 (+1.23%)
     

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In Betmakers Technology Group Ltd (ASX:BET)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

A look at the shareholders of Betmakers Technology Group Ltd (ASX:BET) can tell us which group is most powerful. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Betmakers Technology Group is a smaller company with a market capitalization of AU$335m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Betmakers Technology Group.

View our latest analysis for Betmakers Technology Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Betmakers Technology Group?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Betmakers Technology Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Betmakers Technology Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Betmakers Technology Group. The company's largest shareholder is Tekkorp Holdings Llc, with ownership of 12%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 8.0% of the stock. In addition, we found that Todd Buckingham, the CEO has 1.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Betmakers Technology Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Betmakers Technology Group Ltd. In their own names, insiders own AU$33m worth of stock in the AU$335m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Betmakers Technology Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 12% stake in Betmakers Technology Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Betmakers Technology Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.