U.S. markets open in 5 hours 16 minutes
  • S&P Futures

    3,783.25
    -38.00 (-0.99%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    30,745.00
    -254.00 (-0.82%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    11,553.50
    -137.50 (-1.18%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,703.70
    -17.70 (-1.03%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    109.63
    -0.15 (-0.14%)
     
  • Gold

    1,815.20
    -2.30 (-0.13%)
     
  • Silver

    20.73
    -0.01 (-0.06%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0450
    +0.0007 (+0.06%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.0930
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Vix

    29.36
    +1.00 (+3.53%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2156
    +0.0034 (+0.28%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    136.2070
    -0.3380 (-0.25%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    19,376.15
    -731.26 (-3.64%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    416.07
    -23.59 (-5.37%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,184.85
    -127.47 (-1.74%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,393.04
    -411.56 (-1.54%)
     

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In Mineral Resources Limited (ASX:MIN)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in Mineral Resources Limited (ASX:MIN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of AU$10b, Mineral Resources is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Mineral Resources.

Check out our latest analysis for Mineral Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mineral Resources?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Mineral Resources does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Mineral Resources' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Mineral Resources. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Mineral Resources' case, its Top Key Executive, Christopher Ellison, is the largest shareholder, holding 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.4% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Mineral Resources

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Mineral Resources Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful AU$1.3b stake in this AU$10b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

General Public Ownership

With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Mineral Resources. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Mineral Resources you should know about.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.