U.S. Markets open in 8 hrs 48 mins
  • S&P Futures

    4,073.75
    -11.00 (-0.27%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    32,524.00
    -57.00 (-0.17%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    12,500.25
    -60.00 (-0.48%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,831.80
    -5.40 (-0.29%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    113.10
    +0.70 (+0.62%)
     
  • Gold

    1,806.60
    -12.30 (-0.68%)
     
  • Silver

    21.53
    -0.22 (-1.01%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0533
    -0.0022 (-0.2107%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.9680
    -2.9680 (-100.00%)
     
  • Vix

    26.10
    -1.37 (-4.99%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2469
    -0.0023 (-0.1845%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    129.0290
    -0.3290 (-0.2543%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    29,845.40
    -508.54 (-1.68%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    671.16
    +428.48 (+176.56%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,518.35
    +53.55 (+0.72%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,834.38
    +174.63 (+0.66%)
     

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

The big shareholder groups in Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) have power over the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of US$568m, Waterdrop is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Waterdrop.

See our latest analysis for Waterdrop

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Waterdrop?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Waterdrop. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Waterdrop's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Waterdrop is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Peng Shen is the largest shareholder with 24% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 21% and 12%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Waterdrop

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Waterdrop Inc.. Insiders have a US$138m stake in this US$568m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Waterdrop. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 12% stake in Waterdrop. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 21% of Waterdrop. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Waterdrop you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.