U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    4,121.00
    +14.00 (+0.34%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    34,014.00
    +76.00 (+0.22%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    13,172.00
    +71.75 (+0.55%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,175.40
    +6.80 (+0.31%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    63.54
    -0.28 (-0.44%)
     
  • Gold

    1,823.00
    -1.00 (-0.05%)
     
  • Silver

    27.07
    +0.01 (+0.04%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.2083
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.6680
    -0.0270 (-1.59%)
     
  • Vix

    23.13
    -4.46 (-16.17%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.4041
    -0.0011 (-0.08%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    109.6020
    +0.1680 (+0.15%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    49,675.97
    -646.30 (-1.28%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,360.89
    -27.02 (-1.95%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    6,963.33
    -41.30 (-0.59%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,883.05
    +435.04 (+1.58%)
     

Do Institutions Own Mindbeacon Holdings Inc. (TSE:MBCN) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Simply Wall St
·5 min read
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls Mindbeacon Holdings Inc. (TSE:MBCN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Mindbeacon Holdings is a smaller company with a market capitalization of CA$216m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Mindbeacon Holdings.

View our latest analysis for Mindbeacon Holdings

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mindbeacon Holdings?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Mindbeacon Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Mindbeacon Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Mindbeacon Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Claire Duboc is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.2% of the stock.

Our studies suggest that the top 15 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Mindbeacon Holdings

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Mindbeacon Holdings Inc.. Insiders own CA$35m worth of shares in the CA$216m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public -- mostly retail investors -- own 53% of Mindbeacon Holdings. This level of ownership gives retail investors the power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.4%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 6.2% of the Mindbeacon Holdings shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Mindbeacon Holdings you should know about.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.