U.S. markets close in 5 hours 22 minutes
  • S&P 500

    3,622.62
    -96.42 (-2.59%)
     
  • Dow 30

    29,086.15
    -597.59 (-2.01%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    10,676.64
    -375.00 (-3.39%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,660.18
    -55.06 (-3.21%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.59
    -0.56 (-0.68%)
     
  • Gold

    1,657.70
    -12.30 (-0.74%)
     
  • Silver

    18.53
    -0.34 (-1.83%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    0.9731
    -0.0008 (-0.08%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.8040
    +0.0990 (+2.67%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.0959
    +0.0073 (+0.68%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    144.6340
    +0.5120 (+0.36%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    18,985.43
    -308.05 (-1.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    433.86
    -12.12 (-2.72%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    6,839.98
    -165.41 (-2.36%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,422.05
    +248.07 (+0.95%)
     

Do Institutions Own Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NASDAQ:NNOX) Shares?

·5 min read

Every investor in Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NASDAQ:NNOX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of US$798m, Nano-X Imaging is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Nano-X Imaging.

See our latest analysis for Nano-X Imaging

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nano-X Imaging?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nano-X Imaging. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nano-X Imaging, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Nano-X Imaging. Our data suggests that Ran Poliakine, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 5.5%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.2% of common stock, and SK Square Co., Ltd. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Nano-X Imaging

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Nano-X Imaging Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$798m, and insiders have US$99m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of Nano-X Imaging shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 3.7%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 5.0% of Nano-X Imaging. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nano-X Imaging better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Nano-X Imaging is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here