U.S. Markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,532.76
    -44.35 (-0.97%)
     
  • Dow 30

    35,028.65
    -339.82 (-0.96%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,340.25
    -166.64 (-1.15%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,062.78
    -33.44 (-1.60%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    86.64
    +1.21 (+1.42%)
     
  • Gold

    1,841.90
    +29.50 (+1.63%)
     
  • Silver

    24.22
    +0.73 (+3.10%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1352
    +0.0022 (+0.1930%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.8270
    -0.0380 (-2.04%)
     
  • Vix

    23.82
    +1.03 (+4.52%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3614
    +0.0016 (+0.1144%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    114.2600
    -0.3250 (-0.2836%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    41,739.48
    -251.72 (-0.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    991.80
    -2.94 (-0.30%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,589.66
    +26.11 (+0.35%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,467.23
    -790.02 (-2.80%)
     

Do Institutions Own North Mountain Merger Corp. (NASDAQ:NMMC) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·5 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls North Mountain Merger Corp. (NASDAQ:NMMC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

North Mountain Merger is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$164m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about North Mountain Merger.

See our latest analysis for North Mountain Merger

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About North Mountain Merger?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that North Mountain Merger does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see North Mountain Merger's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 16% of North Mountain Merger. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. North Mountain LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of North Mountain Merger

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

General Public Ownership

With a 36% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over North Mountain Merger. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 20%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for North Mountain Merger you should be aware of.

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.