U.S. markets close in 1 hour 10 minutes
  • S&P 500

    4,143.25
    -20.04 (-0.48%)
     
  • Dow 30

    34,178.00
    -149.79 (-0.44%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    13,354.65
    -24.39 (-0.18%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,228.34
    +1.23 (+0.06%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    65.49
    -0.78 (-1.18%)
     
  • Gold

    1,869.70
    +2.10 (+0.11%)
     
  • Silver

    28.45
    +0.19 (+0.69%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.2231
    +0.0074 (+0.61%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.6490
    +0.0090 (+0.55%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.4188
    +0.0050 (+0.36%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    108.8690
    -0.3310 (-0.30%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    42,658.46
    -977.92 (-2.24%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,198.87
    -54.27 (-4.33%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,034.24
    +1.39 (+0.02%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,406.84
    +582.01 (+2.09%)
     

Do Institutions Own Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLP) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Simply Wall St
·5 min read
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

The big shareholder groups in Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLP) have power over the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

With a market capitalization of US$1.2b, Simulations Plus is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Simulations Plus.

See our latest analysis for Simulations Plus

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Simulations Plus?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Simulations Plus does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Simulations Plus, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Simulations Plus is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Walter Woltosz (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 24% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. With 9.4% and 6.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Neuberger Berman BD LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Simulations Plus

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Simulations Plus, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.2b, and insiders have US$303m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 20% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Simulations Plus. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Simulations Plus better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Simulations Plus has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.