U.S. Markets close in 40 mins
  • S&P 500

    4,554.54
    -12.46 (-0.27%)
     
  • Dow 30

    34,331.48
    -152.24 (-0.44%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,374.96
    -162.73 (-1.05%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,176.37
    -22.53 (-1.02%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    65.45
    -0.73 (-1.10%)
     
  • Gold

    1,781.00
    +4.50 (+0.25%)
     
  • Silver

    22.25
    -0.57 (-2.48%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1319
    -0.0021 (-0.1811%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.4340
    -0.0090 (-0.62%)
     
  • Vix

    27.28
    +0.09 (+0.33%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3274
    -0.0028 (-0.2097%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    112.7810
    -0.3990 (-0.3525%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    57,248.51
    -265.54 (-0.46%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,461.64
    -7.44 (-0.51%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,168.68
    +109.23 (+1.55%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,935.62
    +113.86 (+0.41%)
     

Do Institutions Own Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Under Armour has a market capitalization of US$9.1b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Under Armour.

Check out our latest analysis for Under Armour

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Under Armour?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Under Armour does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Under Armour, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Under Armour. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Kevin Plank (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 15% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.9% of common stock, and Wellington Management Group LLP holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Under Armour

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Under Armour, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.4b stake in this US$9.1b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 11% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Under Armour. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Under Armour that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.