U.S. Markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    4,318.50
    -23.00 (-0.53%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    33,840.00
    -215.00 (-0.63%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    14,094.75
    -63.75 (-0.45%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,954.00
    -18.70 (-0.95%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    87.10
    -0.25 (-0.29%)
     
  • Gold

    1,817.70
    -12.00 (-0.66%)
     
  • Silver

    23.48
    -0.33 (-1.37%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1236
    -0.0009 (-0.0787%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.8480
    +0.0650 (+3.65%)
     
  • Vix

    31.96
    +0.80 (+2.57%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3448
    -0.0015 (-0.1089%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    114.6700
    +0.0100 (+0.0087%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    36,872.65
    +216.56 (+0.59%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    841.16
    -14.65 (-1.71%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,469.78
    +98.32 (+1.33%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,964.26
    -47.07 (-0.17%)
     

Investors Met With Slowing Returns on Capital At Exelon (NASDAQ:EXC)

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·3 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • EXC

To find a multi-bagger stock, what are the underlying trends we should look for in a business? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Exelon (NASDAQ:EXC) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.

What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Exelon:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.044 = US$5.2b ÷ (US$133b - US$16b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2021).

So, Exelon has an ROCE of 4.4%. Even though it's in line with the industry average of 4.5%, it's still a low return by itself.

View our latest analysis for Exelon

roce
roce

In the above chart we have measured Exelon's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Exelon here for free.

What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us

There hasn't been much to report for Exelon's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Exelon in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. With fewer investment opportunities, it makes sense that Exelon has been paying out a decent 47% of its earnings to shareholders. Given the business isn't reinvesting in itself, it makes sense to distribute a portion of earnings among shareholders.

In Conclusion...

We can conclude that in regards to Exelon's returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. Yet to long term shareholders the stock has gifted them an incredible 103% return in the last five years, so the market appears to be rosy about its future. But if the trajectory of these underlying trends continue, we think the likelihood of it being a multi-bagger from here isn't high.

One more thing: We've identified 4 warning signs with Exelon (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding these would certainly be useful.

While Exelon isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.