U.S. markets open in 6 hours 50 minutes
  • S&P Futures

    4,470.50
    -4.25 (-0.09%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    34,683.00
    +67.00 (+0.19%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    14,773.25
    -67.75 (-0.46%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,028.70
    +7.50 (+0.37%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    86.29
    -0.61 (-0.70%)
     
  • Gold

    1,841.40
    -1.20 (-0.07%)
     
  • Silver

    24.59
    -0.12 (-0.49%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1335
    +0.0018 (+0.16%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.8330
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Vix

    25.59
    +1.74 (+7.30%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3585
    -0.0016 (-0.11%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    113.8130
    -0.2870 (-0.25%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    38,845.41
    -3,148.36 (-7.50%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    917.75
    -77.51 (-7.79%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,585.01
    -4.65 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,522.26
    -250.67 (-0.90%)
     

Investors in Remark Holdings (NASDAQ:MARK) have unfortunately lost 65% over the last five years

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·3 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • MARK

This month, we saw the Remark Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:MARK) up an impressive 84%. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last half decade have been disappointing. The share price has failed to impress anyone , down a sizable 65% during that time. Some might say the recent bounce is to be expected after such a bad drop. Of course, this could be the start of a turnaround.

Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns.

View our latest analysis for Remark Holdings

Remark Holdings wasn't profitable in the last twelve months, it is unlikely we'll see a strong correlation between its share price and its earnings per share (EPS). Arguably revenue is our next best option. When a company doesn't make profits, we'd generally expect to see good revenue growth. That's because it's hard to be confident a company will be sustainable if revenue growth is negligible, and it never makes a profit.

In the last five years Remark Holdings saw its revenue shrink by 44% per year. That's definitely a weaker result than most pre-profit companies report. It seems appropriate, then, that the share price slid about 11% annually during that time. We don't generally like to own companies that lose money and don't grow revenues. You might be better off spending your money on a leisure activity. You'd want to research this company pretty thoroughly before buying, it looks a bit too risky for us.

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. This free interactive report on Remark Holdings' earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.

A Different Perspective

It's nice to see that Remark Holdings shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 36% over the last year. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 11% per year over five years. This makes us a little wary, but the business might have turned around its fortunes. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Remark Holdings (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

We will like Remark Holdings better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on US exchanges.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.