U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    3,818.83
    -2.72 (-0.07%)
     
  • Dow 30

    31,029.31
    +82.32 (+0.27%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    11,177.89
    -3.65 (-0.03%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,719.37
    -19.47 (-1.12%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    109.50
    -2.26 (-2.02%)
     
  • Gold

    1,820.10
    -1.10 (-0.06%)
     
  • Silver

    20.74
    -0.13 (-0.63%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0445
    -0.0080 (-0.76%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.0930
    -0.1130 (-3.52%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2122
    -0.0062 (-0.51%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    136.5930
    +0.4650 (+0.34%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    20,193.92
    -37.44 (-0.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    435.40
    -4.27 (-0.97%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,312.32
    -11.09 (-0.15%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,804.60
    -244.87 (-0.91%)
     

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In Curtiss-Wright Corporation's (NYSE:CW) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

A look at the shareholders of Curtiss-Wright Corporation (NYSE:CW) can tell us which group is most powerful. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

With a market capitalization of US$5.6b, Curtiss-Wright is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Curtiss-Wright.

View our latest analysis for Curtiss-Wright

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Curtiss-Wright?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Curtiss-Wright does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Curtiss-Wright's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Curtiss-Wright is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.0% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and FMR LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Curtiss-Wright

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Curtiss-Wright Corporation in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Curtiss-Wright. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Curtiss-Wright better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Curtiss-Wright is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.