U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    3,830.25
    -3.75 (-0.10%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    30,896.00
    -40.00 (-0.13%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    11,806.25
    -2.25 (-0.02%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,737.50
    -4.20 (-0.24%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    100.43
    +0.93 (+0.93%)
     
  • Gold

    1,770.10
    +6.20 (+0.35%)
     
  • Silver

    19.16
    +0.04 (+0.20%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0266
    -0.0004 (-0.04%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.8090
    -0.0800 (-2.77%)
     
  • Vix

    27.54
    +0.01 (+0.04%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.1966
    +0.0014 (+0.12%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    135.1870
    -0.6550 (-0.48%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    19,865.53
    -327.93 (-1.62%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    429.77
    -10.26 (-2.33%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,025.47
    -207.18 (-2.86%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,077.55
    -345.92 (-1.31%)
     

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited's (NZSE:FPH) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited (NZSE:FPH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

Fisher & Paykel Healthcare is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of NZ$11b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare.

View our latest analysis for Fisher & Paykel Healthcare

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fisher & Paykel Healthcare?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Fisher & Paykel Healthcare does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. JPMorgan Chase & Co, Private Banking and Investment Banking Investments is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.5% and 6.3% of the stock.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Fisher & Paykel Healthcare

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own NZ$39m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Fisher & Paykel Healthcare is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.