U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    4,444.25
    -30.50 (-0.68%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    34,515.00
    -101.00 (-0.29%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    14,651.50
    -189.50 (-1.28%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,013.30
    -7.90 (-0.39%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    86.29
    -0.61 (-0.70%)
     
  • Gold

    1,841.40
    -1.20 (-0.07%)
     
  • Silver

    24.49
    -0.23 (-0.93%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1329
    +0.0012 (+0.10%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.8330
    +0.0060 (+0.33%)
     
  • Vix

    25.59
    +1.74 (+7.30%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3595
    -0.0005 (-0.04%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    113.7300
    -0.3700 (-0.32%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    38,826.46
    -3,091.74 (-7.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    917.40
    -77.86 (-7.82%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,585.01
    -4.65 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,363.89
    -409.04 (-1.47%)
     

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MVST) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • MVST

The big shareholder groups in Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:MVST) have power over the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of US$2.8b, Microvast Holdings is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Microvast Holdings.

View our latest analysis for Microvast Holdings

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Microvast Holdings?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Microvast Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Microvast Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Microvast Holdings. With a 28% stake, CEO Yang Wu is the largest shareholder. The second and third largest shareholders are CDH Griffin Holdings Company Limited and CDH Investment Management Company Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 12%.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

Insider Ownership Of Microvast Holdings

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Microvast Holdings, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$2.8b, and insiders have US$852m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Microvast Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 20% stake in Microvast Holdings. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 12%, of the Microvast Holdings stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Microvast Holdings (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.