U.S. markets close in 14 minutes
  • S&P 500

    4,119.77
    -20.29 (-0.49%)
     
  • Dow 30

    32,752.96
    -79.58 (-0.24%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    12,494.09
    -150.37 (-1.19%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,908.80
    -32.41 (-1.67%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    90.75
    -0.01 (-0.01%)
     
  • Gold

    1,812.50
    +7.30 (+0.40%)
     
  • Silver

    20.50
    -0.11 (-0.53%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0211
    +0.0017 (+0.16%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.7970
    +0.0320 (+1.16%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2066
    -0.0015 (-0.13%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    135.1660
    +0.1930 (+0.14%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    23,075.49
    -860.61 (-3.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    535.67
    -21.68 (-3.89%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,488.15
    +5.78 (+0.08%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,999.96
    -249.28 (-0.88%)
     

What Kind Of Shareholders Own Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. (NYSE:FBHS)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

A look at the shareholders of Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. (NYSE:FBHS) can tell us which group is most powerful. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

Fortune Brands Home & Security is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of US$8.0b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Check out our latest analysis for Fortune Brands Home & Security

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fortune Brands Home & Security?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Fortune Brands Home & Security does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fortune Brands Home & Security's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Fortune Brands Home & Security is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Fortune Brands Home & Security

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$40m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fortune Brands Home & Security. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Fortune Brands Home & Security (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.