U.S. Markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,026.12
    -1.14 (-0.03%)
     
  • Dow 30

    34,347.03
    +152.97 (+0.45%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    11,226.36
    -58.96 (-0.52%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,869.19
    +5.67 (+0.30%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    76.28
    -1.66 (-2.13%)
     
  • Gold

    1,754.00
    +8.40 (+0.48%)
     
  • Silver

    21.43
    +0.06 (+0.29%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0405
    -0.0008 (-0.0728%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.6910
    -0.0150 (-0.40%)
     
  • Vix

    20.50
    +0.08 (+0.39%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2091
    -0.0023 (-0.1935%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    139.1000
    +0.5100 (+0.3680%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    16,499.34
    -30.53 (-0.18%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    386.97
    +4.32 (+1.13%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,486.67
    +20.07 (+0.27%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,283.03
    -100.06 (-0.35%)
     

What You Need To Know About JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:JAKK) Investor Composition

If you want to know who really controls JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (NASDAQ:JAKK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

JAKKS Pacific is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$127m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about JAKKS Pacific.

Check out our latest analysis for JAKKS Pacific

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JAKKS Pacific?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

JAKKS Pacific already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of JAKKS Pacific, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in JAKKS Pacific. Lawrence Rosen is currently the company's largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. Benefit Street Partners L.L.C. is the second largest shareholder owning 15% of common stock, and Meisheng Cultural & Creative Corp., Ltd. holds about 5.5% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Stephen Berman directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of JAKKS Pacific

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in JAKKS Pacific, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$127m, and insiders have US$27m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in JAKKS Pacific. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 5.5% of the JAKKS Pacific shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for JAKKS Pacific (2 are potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.