U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    3,721.75
    -10.25 (-0.27%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    29,673.00
    -77.00 (-0.26%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    11,512.75
    -43.00 (-0.37%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,716.80
    -4.00 (-0.23%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.80
    -0.35 (-0.43%)
     
  • Gold

    1,662.50
    -7.50 (-0.45%)
     
  • Silver

    18.70
    -0.17 (-0.93%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    0.9681
    -0.0058 (-0.60%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.7050
    -0.2590 (-6.53%)
     
  • Vix

    30.18
    -2.42 (-7.42%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.0787
    -0.0099 (-0.91%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    144.3200
    +0.1980 (+0.14%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    19,433.82
    +816.69 (+4.39%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    444.35
    +15.57 (+3.63%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,005.39
    +20.80 (+0.30%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    26,283.33
    +109.35 (+0.42%)
     

What You Need To Know About Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LCUT) Investor Composition

·5 min read

A look at the shareholders of Lifetime Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:LCUT) can tell us which group is most powerful. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

Lifetime Brands is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$275m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Lifetime Brands.

See our latest analysis for Lifetime Brands

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lifetime Brands?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Lifetime Brands already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lifetime Brands' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lifetime Brands. Our data shows that Taylor Parent, LLC is the largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Robert Kay directly holds 2.0% of the total shares outstanding.

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Lifetime Brands

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Lifetime Brands, Inc.. Insiders own US$36m worth of shares in the US$275m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 5.4%, private equity firms could influence the Lifetime Brands board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 27%, of the Lifetime Brands stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Lifetime Brands (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.