U.S. markets close in 3 hours 28 minutes
  • S&P 500

    4,248.77
    +2.33 (+0.05%)
     
  • Dow 30

    33,924.53
    -21.05 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,275.88
    +22.61 (+0.16%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,303.97
    +8.02 (+0.35%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    73.62
    +0.77 (+1.06%)
     
  • Gold

    1,787.30
    +9.90 (+0.56%)
     
  • Silver

    26.20
    +0.34 (+1.33%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1947
    +0.0004 (+0.04%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.4850
    +0.0130 (+0.88%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3977
    +0.0029 (+0.21%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    110.9100
    +0.2750 (+0.25%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    33,794.68
    +1,585.16 (+4.92%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    813.49
    +3.30 (+0.41%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,074.06
    -15.95 (-0.22%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,874.89
    -9.24 (-0.03%)
     

What You Need To Know About Nanosonics Limited's (ASX:NAN) Investor Composition

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in Nanosonics Limited (ASX:NAN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of AU$1.8b, Nanosonics is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Nanosonics.

View our latest analysis for Nanosonics

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nanosonics?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nanosonics. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Nanosonics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nanosonics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Maurie Stang with 6.3% of shares outstanding. With 5.4% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Bernard Stang and Selector Funds Management Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Nanosonics

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Nanosonics Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$1.8b, and insiders have AU$291m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public collectively holds 59% of Nanosonics shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Nanosonics you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.