U.S. Markets closed

# Is Laserbond Limited’s (ASX:LBL) PE Ratio A Signal To Sell For Investors?

I am writing today to help inform people who are new to the stock market and want to learn about the link between company’s fundamentals and stock market performance.

Laserbond Limited (ASX:LBL) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 19, which is higher than the industry average of 14.4. Though this might seem to be a negative, you might change your mind after I explain the assumptions behind the P/E ratio. Today, I will explain what the P/E ratio is as well as what you should look out for when using it.

### What you need to know about the P/E ratio

P/E is often used for relative valuation since earnings power is a chief driver of investment value. By comparing a stock’s price per share to its earnings per share, we are able to see how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

P/E Calculation for LBL

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

LBL Price-Earnings Ratio = A\$0.20 ÷ A\$0.0105 = 19x

On its own, the P/E ratio doesn’t tell you much; however, it becomes extremely useful when you compare it with other similar companies. We preferably want to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar features to LBL, such as capital structure and profitability. A quick method of creating a peer group is to use companies in the same industry, which is what I will do. LBL’s P/E of 19 is higher than its industry peers (14.4), which implies that each dollar of LBL’s earnings is being overvalued by investors. This multiple is a median of profitable companies of 7 Machinery companies in AU including Oldfields Holdings, Environmental Group and MaxiTRANS Industries. You could think of it like this: the market is pricing LBL as if it is a stronger company than the average of its industry group.

### Assumptions to be aware of

However, it is important to note that our examination of the stock is based on certain assumptions. Firstly, that our peer group contains companies that are similar to LBL. If this isn’t the case, the difference in P/E could be due to other factors. For example, if Laserbond Limited is growing faster than its peers, then it would deserve a higher P/E ratio. We should also be aware that the stocks we are comparing to LBL may not be fairly valued. Just because it is trading on a higher P/E ratio than its peers does not mean it must be overvalued. After all, the peer group could be undervalued.

### What this means for you:

If your personal research into the stock confirms what the P/E ratio is telling you, it might be a good time to rebalance your portfolio and reduce your holdings in LBL. But keep in mind that the usefulness of relative valuation depends on whether you are comfortable with making the assumptions I mentioned above. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I highly recommend you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for LBL’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for LBL’s outlook.
2. Past Track Record: Has LBL been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of LBL’s historicals for more clarity.
3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.