Nokia has offered Siemens of 1.7 billion euro ($2.22 billion) for Siemens' 50% stake in their joint venture called Nokia Siemens Network. Pending regulatory approval, the deal is expected to close in this year's third quarter. Nokia will own 100% of the business, which is expected to take on a new name.
Before we continue, allow me to address a point: There are now reports suggesting that Nokia's 1.7 billion euro offer to Siemens is actually under what would be fair market value for the NSN business. Nokia is perceived to be taking advantage of its partner. I disagree.
As I pointed out recently, this deal was not a surprise. It was just a matter of time before it (or a deal similar) was announced, even though NSN had grown quickly to become a worthwhile threat to the services offered by Ericsson and Huawei. Siemens, which has been going through restructuring plans of its own, had made it known on more than one occasion that it wanted out of the partnership.
Because of the growth that NSN experienced over the past couple of years, Siemens anticipated there would be more interest from would-be buyers for its share of the business. The market didn't oblige. Given Cisco's recent shopping spree, Cisco's name was mentioned as an obligatory candidate. Cisco remained silent. Although Alcatel-Lucent would have brought seamless synergies to NSN, it also would have been a colossal mistake, given ALU's own cost-cutting plans.
Complicating matters was the fact that the NSN business is coming off a pretty terrible quarter, during which NSN suffered a surprising 5% drop in first-quarter sales (reported in April), which also declined 30% sequentially.
Now, I'm just speculating here, but it wouldn't surprise me to know that customers developed some anxiety over Siemens' perceived lack of commitment to the NSN business.
Consequently, during these past three months no one stepped up to offer Siemens a better deal. Surprisingly, neither Ericsson nor Huawei showed any interest, either. So without any leverage, Siemens had no choice but to accept Nokia's offer on the basis of Siemens' own miscalculation and public statements.
What's more, given the fact that Nokia already has real insight into the value of the NSN business, there was likely no point in negotiating. Let's also not discount how quickly Siemens wanted out of the business. In fact, I would argue that Nokia did Siemens a favor since Siemens can now move on with the rest of its restructuring plans and can focus on its core operations.
But that's not all. Huawei has recently made an interesting leadership move -- appointing Colin Giles, who is a former executive vice president at Nokia, as its new executive vice president of smarphone marketing and sales. This is interesting because only two weeks ago Richard Yu, chairman of Huawei's consumer business group, raised some eyebrows after he confirmed in a Financial Times interview, that his company was interested in acquiring Nokia.
On the subject of Nokia, Yu said:
"We are considering these sorts of acquisitions; maybe the combination has some synergies but depends on the willingness of Nokia. We are open-minded."
Huawei later defused the subject, stating that Yu was speaking out of context. I'll take them at their word, but this is not the first time these sorts of statements regarding Nokia have been raised. Huawei has made it known it wants to grow its mobile devices capabilities to challenge both Apple and Samsung. What has often stunted Huawei's progress towards Nokia, though, has been Nokia's insistence on sticking with Microsoft's Windows-based platform. Huawei has referred to Windows as "weak."
Working in Nokia's favor is the company suddenly looks more attractive as the "best third option" behind Apple and Samsung, especially since BlackBerry has drastically fallen out of the picture. Regarding a Nokia acquisition, even if it's not Huawei, which already has a strong presence in smartphones, let's not rule out Lenovo, which has been working to diversify its business from personal computers.
Whichever company steps in would need to do it quickly as Nokia is getting progressively more expensive, up 36% over the past two months. It's interesting how the tides have quickly shifted. Several months ago we were discussing Nokia's impending death. Today, the company has become one of the hottest commodities on the market.
What Nokia decides to do from here is anyone's guess. But I do believe that shareholders are poised to earn a much better return than what they have received at any point during Stephen Elop's tenure as CEO.
At the time of publication, the author was long AAPL.
This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.