This article was originally published on ETFTrends.com.
After debuting last week with an opening price of $72, Lyft continues to struggle with a 3 percent drop on Tuesday with analyst downgrades putting pressure on the ridesharing company early on in its publicly-traded existence.
Michael Ward, an analyst at Seaport Global Securities, issued Lyft a sell rating and a 12-month price target of just $42 a share--a drop of over 40 percent from its opening price. Ward cites the company's valuation as a cause for skepticism.
Ward says that unless a major shift in the mindset of millennials takes place in terms of opting to use more ridesharing services as opposed to a their own vehicle, the stock could continue to languish.
"In order to justify its current market valuation, investors need to take a big leap of faith that the millennials and later generations will forego ownership of a car and opt instead for reliance on a ridesharing service," Ward said in a note.
"While we believe the ridesharing market will continue to grow and expect LYFT to be a prime competitor, in our view, current valuations reflect an overly optimistic view of consumer behavior in the US," said Ward.
Lyft was already in a tenuous position prior to its IPO debut. According to S&P Global Market Intelligence, Lyft posted a loss of $911 million in 2018, making it the most any U.S. startup has lost in the 12 months leading up to its IPO.
Lyft did post a record $2.16 billion in revenue, but according to Ilya Strebulaev, a Stanford University business professor who studies late-stage startups, that doesn’t necessarily translate to success once going public.
“Many of their business models have not been tested fully,” said Strebulaev. “I would not be surprised if many of these companies would not be as successful as investors expect them to be.”
ETFs to Play
For investors looking to play the IPO space, they can look at exchange-traded funds (ETFs) like the Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) , Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and the First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) . These options can certainly provide investors with the distinct advantages of investing in ETFs as opposed to individual stocks.
Stocks are exposed to all of the risk associated with ownership of that particular company. Conversely, an ETF that purchases a mix of stocks or other assets will have less risk exposure.
Additionally, investors may feel it's time for value to overtake growth-oriented sectors like the IPO industry. With that said, investors can play the Direxion Russell 1000 Growth Over Value ETF (RWGV) and the Direxion Russell 1000 Value Over Growth ETF (RWVG) .
For investors looking for continued upside in growth-oriented equities over value-oriented equities, RWGV offers them the ability to benefit not only from growth opportunities potentially performing well, but from their outperformance compared to value.
Conversely, if investors believe that value-oriented equities will outperform growth-oriented equities, RWVG provides a means to not only see value opportunities perform well, but as a way to capitalize on their outperformance compared to growth.
For more relative market trends, visit our Relative Value Channel.
POPULAR ARTICLES AND RESOURCES FROM ETFTRENDS.COM
- SPY ETF Quote
- VOO ETF Quote
- QQQ ETF Quote
- VTI ETF Quote
- JNUG ETF Quote
- Top 34 Gold ETFs
- Top 34 Oil ETFs
- Top 57 Financials ETFs
- Using Merger Arbitrage as a Hedge Against Market Volatility
- A Better Way to Determine Risk Exposure for Growth ETF Investors
- Report Findings Highlight Fake Bitcoin Trading on Unregulated Exchanges
- How to Manage A Mature Bull Market With Macro-Themed ETF Strategies
- In the Know: Building a Low Cost, Defensive Portfolio