MUNICH, GERMANY--(Marketwire - Mar 27, 2013) - Companies that engage in mergers and acquisitions often justify the deals by pointing to the potential synergies that transactions will unlock. But those acquirers also know how much of the synergies they can afford to award the seller in the form of a transaction price premium. Research shows that successful acquirers share only about one-third of the annual capitalized value of synergies with sellers, according to a new report by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and Technische Universität München (TUM). The report, titled Divide and Conquer, How Successful Acquirers Split the Synergies, is being released today.
The report details the empirically based methodology that BCG and TUM have developed to help companies quantify the value of synergies in comparison with the takeover premium that the acquirer offers to pay. By expressing the price in terms of anticipated synergies, acquirers and investors can determine whether a price that motivates the target's shareholders to sell also has the potential to reward the acquirer's shareholders with a value-creating transaction.
In addition, the report quantifies the value that acquirers can create by communicating deal strategy and disclosing the value of synergies. "When evaluating a deal's upside, shareholders appreciate details about the acquirer's strategic and financial M&A rationale, and they reward communicative acquirers with higher-than-expected valuations in the period after a deal is announced," said Dr. Jens Kengelbach, a BCG partner and coauthor of the report.
Synergy Potential Varies Widely By Country and Industry
The value of synergies fluctuates widely even among companies in the same industry. An analysis of large deals in the oil and gas sector from 2001 through 2011, for example, shows that the value of synergies ranged from 5.8 percent to 0.2 percent of the target company's annual sales. What's more, some industries, particularly those such as transportation, telecommunications, and utilities, offer little room for value creation through synergies, even though they are "natural monopolies" that in theory have high synergy potential. Companies in these industries are usually subject to extensive oversight by national regulators that bar them from realizing all available savings. Industries with a high level of ongoing international consolidation, on the other hand, can generate significant synergies. BCG and TUM find that the median synergies that such companies can generate are equal to 4.8 percent of the target company's overall sales and 1.5 percent of the combined company's annual sales.
As general rule, acquirers that disclose synergies when announcing a deal will focus primarily on cost synergies, which acquirers can reliably realize through their own efforts. By contrast, revenue synergies are more difficult to quantify and realize, depending as they do on the behavior of customers and other third parties. "Investors therefore tend to be skeptical of acquirers that price in revenue synergies," said Dr. Kengelbach. "They believe those synergies only after they are realized."
Best Practices Can Help Deals Succeed
BCG has identified the best practices for setting synergy expectations at the time a deal is announced and for tracking progress against synergy targets. These best practices include the following:
- Providing a context for the current deal by referring back to earlier transactions to demonstrate that each new deal is premised on sound, consistent strategic logic.
- Explaining in detail the strategic and financial rationale for the current deal in the form of a narrative that takes into account current macroeconomic conditions, industry fundamentals, and the competitive positions and differentiating strengths of both acquirer and target.
- Disclosing the value and sources of anticipated synergies and providing -- and regularly updating -- a timetable for meeting and possibly exceeding their synergy estimates.
As varied as these practices are, they are rooted in a single imperative: be straightforward, candid, and as accurate as possible.
A copy of the report can be downloaded at www.bcgperspectives.com.
To arrange an interview with one of the authors, please contact Eric Gregoire at +1 617 850 3783 or email@example.com.
About The Boston Consulting Group
The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) is a global management consulting firm and the world's leading advisor on business strategy. We partner with clients from the private, public, and not-for-profit sectors in all regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their enterprises. Our customized approach combines deep insight into the dynamics of companies and markets with close collaboration at all levels of the client organization. This ensures that our clients achieve sustainable competitive advantage, build more capable organizations, and secure lasting results. Founded in 1963, BCG is a private company with 78 offices in 43 countries. For more information, please visit bcg.com.
About Technische Universität München
Founded in 1868, Technische Universität München (TUM) is today one of Europe's leading universities. TUM offers 156 different academic programs spanning 13 faculties, with 478 professors, 32,000 students, and more than 9,000 staff members. The TUM School of Management was founded in 2002. It is, according to several different rankings, among the leading German management schools. For more information, please visit www.fm.wi.tum.de.
Bcgperspectives.com features the latest thinking from BCG experts as well as from CEOs, academics, and other leaders. It covers issues at the top of senior management's agenda. It also provides unprecedented access to BCG's extensive archive of thought leadership stretching back almost 50 years to the days of Bruce Henderson, the firm's founder and one of the architects of modern management consulting. All of our content -- including videos, podcasts, commentaries, and reports -- can be accessed via PC, mobile, iPad, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.